ReviewJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2025
Lessons learned from QT prolongation risk assessment for antibody-drug conjugates in oncology.
Review in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- QT Prolongation Risk of Antibody-Drug Conjugates.Drug safety · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are advanced cancer therapeutics that link monoclonal antibodies to cytotoxic drugs, enhancing targeted delivery to tumors. Since the FDA's first ADC approval in 2000, 14 ADCs have received approval to date (March 2025), underscoring their therapeutic value across cancer types. A prolonged QT interval is a known risk factor for the development of torsades de pointes (TdP), a potentially fatal ventricular arrhythmia. Therefore, assessing and mitigating the potential for QT prolongation is a fundamental aspect of drug development, especially for oncology therapeutics where patients may already be at an increased risk of cardiovascular complications or receiving other QT-prolonging drugs. Traditional QT risk assessment, as outlined in the ICH E14 guidance, is challenging in oncology due the safety profile of anticancer drugs, which precludes study in healthy participants, and the ethical complications of placebo-controlled studies in patients with cancer; therefore, dedicated QT studies and/or concentration-corrected QT (QTc) assessments have been used as alternative approaches. This review investigates QT risk assessment for FDA-approved ADCs, examining nonclinical and clinical approaches and summarizing the strategies used in informing each ADC's labeling. Findings suggest that ADCs generally exhibit low proarrhythmic risk, attributed to the low systemic concentration of their payloads, and minimal QT effects have been observed in clinical settings. This analysis advocates a streamlined, fit-for-purpose QT risk assessment strategy in ADC development, reducing reliance on dedicated QT studies and promoting integrated assessments in early-phase trials. This approach can optimize ADC safety evaluation, supporting ongoing innovation and therapeutic application in oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40721543What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.