ArticlePediatric research2025
Paternal perinatal intimate partner violence victimization and child abuse.
Article in Pediatric research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPerinatal intimate partner violence (IPV) poses significant health risks for victims and their children. While maternal IPV victimization has been extensively studied, research on paternal IPV victimization remains limited. This study examines the prevalence of paternal perinatal IPV victimization and its association with child abuse and paternal psychological distress.
methodsWe analyzed cross-sectional data from 1248 postnatal fathers whose partners had given birth within 1 year in August 2021. IPV victimization was assessed across physical, psychological, economic, and sexual abuse subtypes. Outcomes included child abuse (physical, psychological, neglect, or any abuse) and paternal psychological distress. Modified Poisson regression was used to compute risk ratios (RR).
resultsAmong fathers surveyed, 13.6% reported IPV victimization. Paternal IPV was associated with increased risk of child abuse, including physical (RR 2.04; 95% CI, 1.33-3.14), psychological (RR 2.08; 95% CI, 1.52-2.84), neglect (RR 3.10; 95% CI, 1.70-5.66), and any abuse (RR 1.98; 95% CI, 1.50-2.61).
conclusionsPaternal perinatal IPV victimization is a significant public health concern associated with an increased risk of child abuse and psychological distress. These findings highlight the importance of considering fathers in IPV-related research and suggest the need for further study on inclusive approaches to family violence prevention. IMPACT: Perinatal IPV victimization leads to adverse health outcomes for both victims and their children. Our study found that 14% of postnatal fathers experienced perinatal IPV victimization, highlighting its prevalence. Paternal perinatal IPV victimization is associated with an increased risk of child abuse within the household. Additionally, paternal IPV victimization is linked to higher levels of paternal psychological distress. These findings highlight the need for targeted support for affected fathers to protect child well-being.
Identifiers
40721527What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.