ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2025
Mechanistic insights into 16p13.3 microdeletions encompassing TBC1D24 and ATP6V0C through advanced sequencing approaches.
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- What's new in EJHG this autumn.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chromosomal microdeletions represent a complex class of genetic disorders. Recently, 16p13.3 microdeletions encompassing TBC1D24 and ATP6V0C have gained prominence as structural variants associated with neurodevelopmental disorders, but their occurrence mechanisms remain unexplored. We used a comprehensive range of sequencing technologies (mate pair genome sequencing, linked-pair genome sequencing, nanopore sequencing, targeted locus amplification (TLA), long range and nested PCR followed by Sanger sequencing), to map the exact 16p13.3 microdeletion breakpoints in eight previously reported individuals. Microdeletion breakpoints were successfully mapped in all patients using TLA, split read analysis, PCR/Sanger sequencing, or nanopore sequencing. Alu sequences and/or non-B DNA motifs were detected in all patients. Mechanistic analysis identified distinct pathways underlying these rearrangements. Noteworthy, two unrelated individuals carried identical microdeletions that might have been mediated by an atypical form of non-allelic homologous recombination, given the presence of a 639 bp sequence with 96.2% homology. Microhomology-mediated end-joining and non-homologous end-joining emerged as other mechanisms driving these 16p13.3 microdeletions, which differs from other studied contiguous gene deletion syndromes. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of microdeletion-associated disorder pathophysiology in medical genetics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.