Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40721494›Full record

ArticleEye (London, England)2025

Epiretinal membrane formation following laser photocoagulation for peripheral retinal degeneration: incidence and risk factors.

Biyao Xie, Yingjia Lin, Chiyu Lin, Xuna Qiu, Dezhi Zheng, Dingguo Huang, Weiqi Chen, Zijing Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eye (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Five-year risk of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment following prophylactic laser retinopexy for retinal breaks and lattice degeneration: a real-world analysis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Biyao XieJoint Shantou International Eye Center of Shantou University and The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shantou, Guangdong, China.
Yingjia LinJoint Shantou International Eye Center of Shantou University and The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shantou, Guangdong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-3252-7851
Chiyu LinJoint Shantou International Eye Center of Shantou University and The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shantou, Guangdong, China.
Xuna QiuJoint Shantou International Eye Center of Shantou University and The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shantou, Guangdong, China.
Dezhi ZhengJoint Shantou International Eye Center of Shantou University and The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shantou, Guangdong, China.
Dingguo HuangJoint Shantou International Eye Center of Shantou University and The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shantou, Guangdong, China.
Weiqi ChenJoint Shantou International Eye Center of Shantou University and The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shantou, Guangdong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2852-8192
Zijing HuangJoint Shantou International Eye Center of Shantou University and The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shantou, Guangdong, China. huangzj@jsiec.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2909-2538

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLaser photocoagulation remains the most common treatment for peripheral retinal degeneration. However, potential side effects, particularly inflammation and gliosis, raise concerns about an increased risk of epiretinal membrane (ERM) formation. This study aims to further investigate the association between laser photocoagulation and ERM formation and identify associated risk factors.

methodsThis retrospective study included patients who underwent retinal laser photocoagulation for peripheral retinal degeneration. Clinical data including medical history, ophthalmic examinations during follow-up, and details of the laser photocoagulation, were recorded. Binary regression analysis was used to assess risk factors for ERM formation, including age, ocular findings, and laser parameters.

resultsAmong the 726 eyes, 32 eyes (4.41%) developed ERM during a follow-up period of 29.7 ± 17.2 months. Risk factors included older age (53.9 ± 11.1 vs. 36.6 ± 17.3 years, P < 0.001), presence of lattice degeneration (62.5% vs. 40.3%, P < 0.001), greater number of laser spots (390.1 ± 171.9 vs. 284.8 ± 156.4, P < 0.001), higher total laser energy (22.5 ± 10.8J vs. 13.6 ± 11.9J, P < 0.001), wider extent of laser coverage (4.47 ± 3.38 vs. 3.08 ± 2.10 clock hours, P = 0.028), and shorter distance between the laser and the fovea (7.50 ± 1.72 vs. 8.36 ± 2.16 disc diameters, P = 0.017). Further regression analysis identified age (OR 1.071, 95% CI 1.040-1.102), number of laser spots (OR 1.003, 95% CI 1.001-1.005), and extent of laser coverage (OR 1.178, 95% CI 1.025-1.354) as independent risk factors for ERM development.

conclusionsPeripheral retinal laser photocoagulation does not significantly increase the incidence of ERM. However, careful control of the number and extent of laser applications may help minimize potential damage to the macula.

Indexed as

Epiretinal MembraneLaser CoagulationPostoperative ComplicationsRetinal DegenerationAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual Acuity

Identifiers

PMID40721494
PMCPMC12494792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.