ArticleScientific reports2025
Microbial biomass and enzymatic activity in the rhizosphere of prickly-pear cactus genotypes inoculated with Bacillus subtilis and Paenibacillus Sp.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Some bacterial taxa, such as Bacillus and Paenibacillus, are known to colonize the rhizosphere and promote plant growth. However, little is known about their effect on microbial biomass and enzymatic activity in the rhizosphere of plants under semi-arid conditions. This field study assessed the effects of B. subtilis and Paenibacillus sp. in the rhizosphere of two prickly-pear cactus genotypes on microbial biomass of C, N, and P, and on enzymatic activity during early and late growth stages. The analysis of variance showed that microbial biomass and enzymatic activity were significantly influenced by the interaction between PGPB taxa (B. subtilis and Paenibacillus sp.), prickly-pear cactus genotypes ('Baiana' and 'Doce'), and plant growth stage (90 and 270 days). Specifically, PGPB inoculation increased microbial biomass P, β-glucosidase, and acid phosphatase, while microbial biomass of C and N were primarily driven by differences between cactus genotypes 'Baiana' and 'Doce'. At the early growth stage (90 days), the highest values of microbial biomass C, P, and acid phosphatase were observed, whereas N biomass was higher at the later stage (270 days). B. subtilis increased microbial biomass P in the 'Doce' genotype and acid phosphatase in 'Baiana,' while Paenibacillus sp. increased β-glucosidase in 'Baiana.' The combination of the 'Doce' genotype with B. subtilis enhanced phosphorus availability, suggesting that specific plant-microbe interactions may benefit nutrient acquisition in arid, nutrient-poor soils; however, further research is needed to confirm whether this effect extends to other genotypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.