ArticleScientific reports2025
3D anthropometry of the nasolabial region in children aged 3 to 9 months as reference database for clinical assessment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Unilateral and bilateral ex vivo cleft lip models: universal tools for surgical training at different levels of experience.Head & face medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Treatment for a cleft lip can result in significant functional and aesthetic changes to the nasolabial region. Although three-dimensional (3D) measurements are the gold standard for evaluating cleft surgery, most short- and long-term evaluations still rely on subjective assessment or the measurement of patient photographs. To our knowledge, this work establishes the first baseline and reference group for the nasolabial region in children aged 3 to 9 months without cleft lip or palate. This group can be used for future evaluations, such as those of surgical outcomes or NAM therapy, via 3D anthropometric measurement. Data was collected cross-sectionally from 25 children aged 3 to 9 months using a validated intraoral scanner (Trios 4, 3Shape). Scans were analysed according to 3D anthropometric criteria by metrically accurate measurements of distances, surface curves and angles using 3D inspection software (GOM Inspect, Co. Zeiss, Jena, Germany). Results are presented as reference database combined with a step-by-step guide on the measurement methodology. For easy application all data are additionally presented in the form of formulae in which clinical data can be inserted. Based on the data from healthy children, we propose a new classification of alar base types ranging from 1 to 3. Unlike conventional assessment methods, surface curves and other 3D anthropometric tools provide a highly accurate and objective quantification of the anatomy of the nasolabial region and thus serve as a foundation for future clinical research on cleft lip surgery. Alar base type classification may influence future surgical approaches to cleft lip surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.