ArticleScientific reports2025
Thermodynamically consistent modeling of granular soils using physics-informed neural networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Microstructure-informed constitutive modeling of granular media under multidirectional loading: From particle-scale to continuum.Communications engineering · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, data-driven approaches have gained considerable momentum in the scientific and engineering communities, owing to their capacity to extract complex patterns from high-dimensional data. Despite their potential, these approaches often require extensive high-quality datasets, may exhibit limited extrapolation capability beyond the training domain, and lack a rigorous foundation grounded in physical and thermodynamic principles. To overcome these limitations, physics-informed neural networks have been introduced, embedding governing equations directly into the learning process. Building upon this paradigm, this study presents a novel thermodynamically consistent constitutive model for granular soils, developed within the framework of geotechnically- and physics-informed neural networks (GINN). The model integrates physical laws with data-driven learning via a composite loss function. These include: (i) strictly non-negative material dissipation rate to ensure thermodynamic admissibility, (ii) an admissible range for the predicted stress state, and (iii) bounds on the predicted void ratio. The material dissipation rate is calculated using the total work input and a free energy potential expressed in terms of stress invariants. The model is validated against monotonic drained triaxial test data for specimens prepared with diverse initial void ratios and stress states. The model accurately simulates both the shear strength and dilative response of granular soil samples. Its predictive performance is further benchmarked against two widely adopted constitutive models from the literature, demonstrating comparable accuracy while maintaining consistency with thermodynamic laws.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.