ArticleNature communications2025
Sequence-based virtual screening using transformers.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Unified Hierarchical Multiscale Fusion Framework for Drug-Target Affinity Prediction: From Benchmark Performance to Nanomolar Inhibitor Discovery.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Evaluation of deep learning architectures for predicting ligand interactions with neurologically relevant GPCRs.Journal of cheminformatics · 2026Article
- AI-integrated microfluidics for drug screening: From single cell to organ-on-a-chip.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-driven drug discovery: a deep learning paradigm shift in pharmaceutical research and development.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Accelerating Scaffold Hopping in Fourth-Generation Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors via Multilevel Virtual Screening.ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein-ligand interactions play central roles in myriad biological processes and are of key importance in drug design. Deep learning approaches are becoming cost-effective alternatives to high-throughput experimental methods for ligand identification. Here, to predict the binding affinity between proteins and small molecules, we introduce Ligand-Transformer, a deep learning method based on the transformer architecture. Ligand-Transformer implements a sequence-based approach, where the inputs are the amino acid sequence of the target protein and the topology of the small molecule to enable the prediction of the conformational space explored by the complex between the two. We apply Ligand-Transformer to screen and validate experimentally inhibitors targeting the mutant EGFR
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.