Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40721348›Full record

ArticleThe Medical journal of Australia2025

Assessment of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease in primary care: a consensus statement summary.

Leon A Adams, William W Kemp, Kate R Muller, Elizabeth E Powell, Stuart K Roberts, Luis Calzadilla Bertot, Stephanie Best, Gary Deed, Jon D Emery, Samantha L Hocking and 6 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in The Medical journal of Australia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Leon A AdamsUniversity of Western Australia, Perth, WA.
William W KempAlfred Health, Melbourne, VIC.
Kate R MullerFlinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, SA.
Elizabeth E PowellPrincess Alexandra Hospital, Adelaide, SA.
Stuart K RobertsAlfred Health, Melbourne, VIC.ORCID 0000-0002-9015-7997
Luis Calzadilla BertotUniversity of Western Australia, Perth, WA.ORCID 0000-0001-9221-0272
Stephanie BestUniversity of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC.
Gary DeedMonash University, Melbourne, VIC.ORCID 0000-0001-6914-0982
Jon D EmeryCentre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC.ORCID 0000-0002-5274-6336
Samantha L HockingUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, NSW.
Graham R JonesSt Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW.
John S LubelAlfred Health, Melbourne, VIC.
Sinead SheilsAW Morrow Gastroenterology and Liver Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW.
Stephen M TwiggUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, NSW.
Gerald F WattsRoyal Perth Hospital, Perth, WA.
Jacob GeorgeStorr Liver Centre, Westmead Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW.ORCID 0000-0002-8421-5476

Funding

Gastroenterological Society of Australia
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMetabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is common. This evidence-based consensus statement summary provides recommendations for the assessment and monitoring of adults with MAFLD in primary care. MAIN RECOMMENDATIONS: Adults with type 2 diabetes, obesity or two or more other metabolic risk factors should be tested for MAFLD. Hepatic steatosis should be evaluated using ultrasound, whereas the presence and complications of type 2 diabetes and obesity should be assessed according to current Australian guidelines. Cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease and obstructive sleep apnoea are common in people with MAFLD and should be considered as part of a holistic health assessment. Alternative causes of hepatic steatosis, including excess alcohol consumption, must be considered, and patients with elevated serum aminotransferase levels should be tested for hepatitis B and C infection and iron overload. The risk of advanced liver fibrosis requires assessment using the Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) Index; a low score (< 1.3) is associated with a more than 95% negative predictive value for advanced liver fibrosis. People with an indeterminate FIB-4 score (between 1.3 and 2.7) should undergo second-line assessment with liver elastography or a direct liver fibrosis serum test or, if these tests are unavailable, should be referred to an expert clinician in liver disease. People with MAFLD and a high FIB-4 score (> 2.7), an elevated direct liver fibrosis serum test, high elastography results or with clinical, laboratory or imaging evidence of cirrhosis should be referred for further evaluation. Individuals with a low FIB-4 score (< 1.3), low elastography or direct liver fibrosis serum test results should be monitored with a repeat FIB-4 test at least every three years. Monitoring of weight, body mass index and/or waist circumference and for emergence of type 2 diabetes (in individuals without) should be performed at least annually. CHANGE IN MANAGEMENT AS A RESULT OF THIS CONSENSUS STATEMENT SUMMARY: Appropriate identification, assessment and risk stratification of people with MAFLD will aid referral pathways, further investigation and management.

Indexed as

Fatty LiverNon-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseAdultAustraliaDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2HumansLiver CirrhosisObesityPrimary Health CareRisk FactorsDiabetes mellitus, type 2Liver cirrhosisLiver diseasesObesityPrimary careReferral and consultationRisk assessmentUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID40721348
PMCPMC12399053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.