ArticleThe Medical journal of Australia2025
Assessment of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease in primary care: a consensus statement summary.
Article in The Medical journal of Australia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systems biology framework for the rational design of operational conditions for in vitro/in vivo translation of tissue models.Science advances · 2026Article
- The Malaysian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Consensus Statements on Prevention and Early Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Malaysia.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Review
- The Prevalence and Risk Factors for at-Risk MASH and Advanced Liver Fibrosis in People With Metabolic Risk Factors in Primary Care.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2026Article
- Metabolic disorder-MASLD-cardiovascular disease-kidney disease (MMCK) syndrome: an expansion of the Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic (CKM) framework.Cardiovascular diabetology. Endocrinology reports · 2026Review
- Fatty Liver Disease in Australia: A Narrative Review on the Epidemiology, Natural History, Prognostication and Management in People With Metabolic Dysfunction.The Medical journal of Australia · 2026Review
- Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease: an update.Australian prescriber · 2026Review
- A Novel Fibroblast Activation Protein-Based Algorithm to Assess Fibrosis in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Statins in MASLD and Other Chronic Liver Diseases.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Genetic Variants, Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease, and Major Health Outcomes in Older Adults.Biomedicines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionMetabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is common. This evidence-based consensus statement summary provides recommendations for the assessment and monitoring of adults with MAFLD in primary care. MAIN RECOMMENDATIONS: Adults with type 2 diabetes, obesity or two or more other metabolic risk factors should be tested for MAFLD. Hepatic steatosis should be evaluated using ultrasound, whereas the presence and complications of type 2 diabetes and obesity should be assessed according to current Australian guidelines. Cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease and obstructive sleep apnoea are common in people with MAFLD and should be considered as part of a holistic health assessment. Alternative causes of hepatic steatosis, including excess alcohol consumption, must be considered, and patients with elevated serum aminotransferase levels should be tested for hepatitis B and C infection and iron overload. The risk of advanced liver fibrosis requires assessment using the Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) Index; a low score (< 1.3) is associated with a more than 95% negative predictive value for advanced liver fibrosis. People with an indeterminate FIB-4 score (between 1.3 and 2.7) should undergo second-line assessment with liver elastography or a direct liver fibrosis serum test or, if these tests are unavailable, should be referred to an expert clinician in liver disease. People with MAFLD and a high FIB-4 score (> 2.7), an elevated direct liver fibrosis serum test, high elastography results or with clinical, laboratory or imaging evidence of cirrhosis should be referred for further evaluation. Individuals with a low FIB-4 score (< 1.3), low elastography or direct liver fibrosis serum test results should be monitored with a repeat FIB-4 test at least every three years. Monitoring of weight, body mass index and/or waist circumference and for emergence of type 2 diabetes (in individuals without) should be performed at least annually. CHANGE IN MANAGEMENT AS A RESULT OF THIS CONSENSUS STATEMENT SUMMARY: Appropriate identification, assessment and risk stratification of people with MAFLD will aid referral pathways, further investigation and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.