Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40721322›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2025

Isolating Brain Mechanisms of Expectancy Effects on Pain: Cue-Based Stimulus Expectancies versus Placebo-Based Treatment Expectancies.

Elizabeth A Necka, Titilola Akintola, Qingbao Yu, Carolyn M Amir, Olga Oretsky, Lauren Y Atlas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elizabeth A NeckaNational Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
Titilola AkintolaNational Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
Qingbao YuNational Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
Carolyn M AmirNational Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
Olga OretskyNational Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
Lauren Y AtlasNational Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 lauren.atlas@nih.gov.ORCID 0000-0001-5693-4169

Funding

Neural and psychological mechanisms of pain perception ZIAAT000030 · NCCIH · NATIONAL CENTER FOR COMPLEMENTARY & INTEGRATIVE HEALTH · PI ATLAS, LAUREN · 2015 to 2025
$3.8M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA AT000030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical trials, laboratory experiments, and neuroimaging studies provide converging evidence that pain is highly sensitive to expectations, whether based on the psychosocial context surrounding treatment (e.g., placebo analgesia) or transient cues that provide information about painful events (e.g., pain-predictive cues). We asked whether placebo analgesia and pain-predictive cues modulate pain through the same mechanisms or dissociable brain pathways. Forty healthy volunteers of both sexes rated pain in response to noxious heat during functional magnetic resonance imaging. We crossed pain-predictive cues, which induce expectations for high or low pain on a trial-by-trial basis, with administration of an inert placebo cream or a control cream. Behavioral analyses revealed a significant interaction, such that predictive cues had weaker effects on pain during placebo blocks than control blocks. This interaction was accompanied by interactions in the insula, pons, and other brain regions. We also observed distinct neural substrates when we compared pure cue effects with pure placebo effects, and only predictive cues modulated responses in nociceptive regions and the neurologic pain signature (Wager et al., 2013). The only regions that were influenced similarly by both types of expectations were the rostral anterior cingulate and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex. These results indicate that cue-based expectations about stimulus intensity and placebo-based expectations about treatment outcomes are distinct and that pain researchers should differentiate between sources of expectations. Furthermore, cue-based expectations were associated with more consistent effects than treatment-based expectations, suggesting that clinicians should be particularly mindful of how they present information about impending pain.

Indexed as

Anticipation, PsychologicalBrainCuesPainPlacebo EffectAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePain MeasurementYoung AdultanalgesiaexpectancyfMRIlearningpainplacebo

Identifiers

PMID40721322
PMCPMC12369932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.