Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40721259›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Understanding the needs and experiences of young cancer patients, caregivers and healthcare professionals in the UK following childhood fertility tissue preservation (FTP): a qualitative study informed by patient and public involvement and engagement.

Rebecca Mottram, Richard Feltbower, Georgina Louise Jones, Sarah Gelcich, Katherine McLean, Catherine Kelly, Adam Glaser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rebecca MottramUniversity of Leeds, Leeds, UK r.mottram@leeds.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4041-370X
Richard FeltbowerUniversity of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1728-9408
Georgina Louise JonesLeeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
Sarah GelcichUniversity of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Katherine McLeanPPIE Representative, Leeds, UK.
Catherine KellyPPIE Representative, Leeds, UK.
Adam GlaserUniversity of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildhood cancer treatment can cause subfertility in adulthood. Ovarian or testicular tissue preservation is a rapidly evolving field with significant potential benefits. However, the establishment of patient-centred reproductive survivorship pathways remains a challenge in clinical settings due to a lack of robust evidence to inform its development. Patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) consultation may help ensure that future studies align with patient needs and that tailored survivorship care pathways are developed for young people with preserved fertility tissue.

aimThis PPIE consultation aimed to identify priority areas for future research that would support the development of a tailored survivorship care pathway for childhood cancer survivors who have preserved tissue for future fertility.

methodsRecruitment occurred through national networks, including collaborations with advocacy groups such as Candlelighters and clinical networks. Data were collected via telephone or online unstructured interviews, with some supplementary email exchanges. Thematic analysis was used to identify emergent themes. The Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public (GRIPP)-2 guidelines were used to help guide PPIE.

settingAn online focus group and/or a one-to-one interview with e-mail interactions.

participantsIn total, 12 unique participants took part in a focus group and/or interview. Participants included parents of children who had stored tissue, young adult cancer survivors with stored tissue and five clinicians from the leading National Health Service (NHS) centres in the UK.

resultsSix key themes emerged that highlighted unmet needs and priority areas for research: (1) Lack of communication and information; (2) unmet needs in follow-up care; (3) emotional impact and psychological support; (4) importance of patient and parental involvement; (5) desire for information and education; and (6) long-term concerns and support. Parents, young adults and healthcare clinicians found talking about fertility issues difficult. They noted that consistency of care, education resources and access to emotional support were important areas where improvements could be made. We used thematic analysis to help identify patterns in the data, and we used the Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public (GRIPP)-2 reporting guidelines for PPIE work.

conclusionsPPIE provided valuable insights into the experiences of childhood cancer survivors with preserved fertility tissue, their parents and clinicians, highlighting priority areas to guide future research and ensure it addresses the concerns of care recipients. Our findings suggest that childhood cancer survivors who preserve tissue for future fertility need personalised follow-up care with information and psychological support. A larger sample of participants, studied using a qualitative research design, is needed to capture the full range of experiences, needs and preferences and to ensure that care is inclusive and relevant to the wider population.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsCaregiversFertility PreservationHealth PersonnelNeoplasmsPatient ParticipationAdolescentAdultChildFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleParentsQualitative ResearchUnited KingdomFollow-Up StudiesPaediatric oncologyPatient ParticipationSEXUAL MEDICINESubfertility

Identifiers

PMID40721259
PMCPMC12306308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.