Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40721221›Full record

ArticleWater environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation2025

An Urban Stormwater Contaminant Signature: Defining Priority Contaminants for Urban Stormwater Research.

G Izma, M Raby, M Ijzerman, R Prosser, P Helm, J Renaud, M Sumarah, D McIsaac, R Rooney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. An Urban Stormwater Contaminant Signature: Defining Priority Contaminants for Urban Stormwater Research.Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

G IzmaDepartment of Biology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
M RabyEnvironmental Monitoring and Reporting Branch, Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
M IjzermanSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
R ProsserSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
P HelmEnvironmental Monitoring and Reporting Branch, Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J RenaudLondon Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, London, Ontario, Canada.
M SumarahLondon Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, London, Ontario, Canada.
D McIsaacDepartment of Biology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
R RooneyDepartment of Biology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3956-7210

Funding

Government of Ontario, Canada-Ontario Agreement 3703
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stormwater ponds (SWPs) are a common feature of urban landscapes, designed to manage runoff and reduce flooding. Increasingly, they are also recognized as seminatural habitats supporting aquatic biodiversity. However, SWPs receive complex mixtures of contaminants from surrounding urban areas, and the extent of contamination within the ponds themselves remains underexplored. Most studies have focused on outflows or a narrow set of targeted analytes, limiting our understanding of the exposure risks for organisms residing within these systems. To address this gap, we assessed contaminant profiles in 21 SWPs across a highly urbanized city in Ontario, Canada, using three complementary sampling approaches: time-integrated water samples, biofilm on artificial substrates, and organic diffusive gradients in thin films (o-DGTs). Across all sites, we detected 200 organic compounds, including pesticides, pharmaceuticals, industrial chemicals, and compounds, linked to vehicles and infrastructure. Additionally, we documented widespread chloride and fecal contamination and elevated levels of traffic-related metals in biofilms. From these data, we identified a set of frequently detected and environmentally relevant contaminants, which we term the urban stormwater contaminant signature (USCS). This proposed list may support the development of targeted monitoring strategies and help focus future research on mixture toxicity and risk to aquatic biota. Given the apparent ecological role of SWPs and the range of stressors they contain, assessing cumulative exposures is critical for understanding the potential impacts of urban runoff on resident organisms.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringRainWater Pollutants, ChemicalCitiesOntarioPondsWater Pollutants, Chemicalchemical mixturescontaminated runoffmonitoring chemicalspesticidespharmaceuticalsponds

Identifiers

PMID40721221
PMCPMC12303642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.