ArticleJournal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA
Implementing a community health worker model to address health-related social needs in a community pharmacy network: A pragmatic evaluation.
Article in Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Building Tobacco Treatment Capacity and Sustainability: A Qualitative Study on Implementation of Community Pharmacy Technicians as Community Health Workers.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHealth-related social needs (HRSNs) significantly impact health outcomes, and community pharmacies present an opportunity to integrate HRSN screening and referral services. Embedding community health workers (CHWs) within pharmacies may enhance patient engagement and referral uptake, but evidence on program sustainability and economic viability remains limited.
objectiveTo evaluate key implementation outcomes from statewide implementation of a pharmacy-based HRSN screening and referral program that cross-trained pharmacy staff as CHWs.
methodsA pragmatic evaluation was conducted in 15 community pharmacies in New York State between January and December 2023. Pharmacy staff were cross-trained as CHWs to screen patients using a validated SDoH tool and facilitate referrals through a structured navigation platform. The primary outcome was referral uptake, defined as the proportion of submitted referrals successfully resolved. Secondary outcomes included program fidelity, program reach across urban and rural areas, and economic sustainability assessed using a time-driven activity-based costing framework, implementation framework, and comprehensive cost-benefit analysis.
resultsAmong the 1034 participants screened, 708 social needs were identified, with food insecurity (24%), housing instability (16%), and transportation barriers (14%) most prevalent. Of the 330 initiated referrals, 154 (47%) were successfully resolved with 64% of screenings conducted in rural regions. The total program cost was $107,107, with estimated annual cost savings of $745,101 yielding a benefit-cost ratio of 6.96 and a return on investment of 596%. Breakeven analysis indicated financial sustainability at varying levels of screening volume, depending on reimbursement rates. Financial viability remained robust under a range of cost and resolution rate assumptions.
conclusionCross-training CHWs within pharmacies to address HRSNs is effective and financially sustainable. The program successfully engaged participants across urban and rural areas and resulted in high referral resolution rates. Integrating HRSN programs into pharmacy workflow represents a viable and scalable approach given appropriate policy support and reimbursement mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.