Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40720935›Full record

ReviewJournal of vascular research2025

Noninvasive Bedside Approaches for Assessing Microvascular Dysfunction.

Jacob Widaeus, Ingemar Fredriksson, Sara Tehrani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of vascular research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jacob WidaeusDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ingemar FredrikssonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Sara TehraniDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicrovascular dysfunction is implicated in a range of acute and chronic conditions, ranging from cardiovascular disease to sepsis, often preceding organ damage and clinical symptoms. Within conditions such as diabetes or septic shock, microvascular compromise frequently correlates with disease severity and outcomes, emphasizing the importance of timely, targeted assessment. Noninvasive bedside methods for evaluating microvascular function have rapidly evolved, driven by advances in computational power, artificial intelligence, and novel imaging hardware. SUMMARY: This review provides an overview of clinically feasible noninvasive techniques - including optical coherence tomography angiography, handheld videomicroscopy, laser speckle contrast imaging, reflectance spectroscopy, and related techniques. These methods allow observation under resting conditions and can be combined with functional tests such as post-occlusive reactive hyperemia, heating provocation, or iontophoresis to evaluate microvascular function. KEY MESSAGES: Collectively, these methods provide valuable insights into the structural and functional aspects of the microcirculation, but their clinical application is constrained by need for standardized protocols, validation, and evidence linking microvascular metrics to meaningful patient outcomes. Collaborations among academia, industry, and healthcare remain pivotal to transitioning these methods into regulated, accessible devices. As standardization progresses and evidence grows, this integrative approach of evaluating microvascular function may emerge as a mainstay in clinical practice and translational research.

Indexed as

MicrocirculationMicrovesselsPoint-of-Care TestingVascular DiseasesAnimalsHumansLaser Speckle Contrast ImagingMicroscopy, VideoPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisRegional Blood FlowTomography, Optical CoherenceMicrovascular dysfunctionNoninvasive assessmentPerfusion-based imagingSpectral imagingStructural imaging

Identifiers

PMID40720935
PMCPMC12500282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.