ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2025
Tectal gliomas as a rare finding in presumed idiopathic congenital aqueductal stenosis: patient series.
Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comprehensive review of the cerebral aqueduct: anatomy, embryology, imaging, genetics, molecular, and pathology.Anatomy & cell biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSmall tectal gliomas (TGs) may be unrecognized at initial diagnosis of noncommunicating hydrocephalus, with the etiology typically attributed to idiopathic congenital aqueductal stenosis (CAS). There are 2 published cases of TGs found on follow-up imaging after treatment with endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV). The authors investigated for this phenomenon in a large cohort of patients with TG or CAS treated with ETV or CSF shunting. OBSERVATIONS: The authors reviewed records at their institution from 1999 to 2024, identifying 10 patients initially diagnosed with presumed idiopathic CAS and later found to have underlying TG. Of these, 7 were younger than 1 year of age at hydrocephalus presentation. The median time from CAS to glioma diagnosis was 13 months. Reasons for repeat imaging that identified glioma included postoperative surveillance and recurrent hydrocephalus. Five (50%) lesions grew over follow-up, and 2 required chemotherapy. LESSONS: The authors describe the eventual emergence of TG as a probable cause of hydrocephalus in a cohort of patients initially diagnosed with CAS. As most of these cases were identified incidentally on interval imaging to evaluate adequate function of CSF diversion procedures, follow-up imaging to evaluate for tectal expansion should be considered in children, particularly infants, with a new diagnosis of idiopathic CAS. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE24695.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.