Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40720893›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2025

Gait Disturbances in Older Adults With Cerebral Small Vessel Disease: Mixed Methods Study Using Smartphone Sensors and Video Analysis.

Xiaojun Lai, Li-Yan Qiao, Pei-Luen Patrick Rau, Yankuan Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiaojun LaiDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9930-317X
Li-Yan QiaoDepartment of Neurology, Yuquan Hospital of Tsinghua University, No. 5 Shijingshan Road, Shijingshan District, Beijing, 100040, China, 86 88257755.ORCID 0000-0002-7136-3576
Pei-Luen Patrick RauDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0495-0487
Yankuan LiuDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0005-8535-0804

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) significantly impacts motor functions, particularly gait dynamics. However, its analysis often lacks the integration of comprehensive tools that capture the multifaceted nature of gait disturbances. Traditional methods may not fully address the complexity of CSVD's impact on gait, underscoring the need for a detailed exploration of gait characteristics through advanced technological means. Objective: This study aims to identify the distinct gait patterns and postural adaptations present in patients with CSVD compared to a healthy older population, using an integrative analysis combining sensor and video data to provide a holistic understanding of gait dynamics in CSVD. Methods: This study involved 90 participants older than 50 years (mean age 68.85, SD 9.74 years; 47 males and 43 females), with 24 categorized as normal controls (mean age 66.42, SD 7.51 years) and 66 diagnosed with CSVD (mean age 69.74, SD 10.37 years). Participants performed three walking tasks: normal walking, dual-task walking (with concurrent mental arithmetic), and fast walking. Gait parameters were collected through video data for image posture parameters using the OpenPose BODY_25 key point model, and the "Pocket Gait Test" smartphone app for sensor-based parameters sampled at approximately 40 Hz. Data analysis included 5 sensor-based parameters (step frequency, root mean square (RMS), step variability, step regularity, and step symmetry) and 6 key video-based parameters (including knee angle, ankle angle, elbow angle, body trunk angles, and head posture). Results: Among the 29 participants with complete sensor and video data (10 normal controls and 19 patients with CSVD), significant differences were observed in step regularity (normal walking: mean 0.76, SD 0.09 vs mean 0.61, SD 0.25; P<.003 and dual-task: mean 0.74, SD 0.13 vs mean 0.57 SD 0.24; P<.005), RMS (normal walking: mean 1.64, SD 0.45 vs mean 1.43, SD 0.42; P<.006), and forward head posture angles (head-to-body angle during normal walking: mean 132.96, SD 7.78 vs mean 128.07, SD 7.99; P<.02 and head-to-ground angle: mean 134.11, SD 8.28 vs mean 128.40, SD 9.75; P<.008) between the CSVD and control groups. The CSVD group exhibited a more pronounced forward head posture across all walking tasks, with the greatest difference observed during dual-task walking (head-to-ground angle: mean 134.43, SD 8.29 vs mean 125.02, SD 8.42; P<.02). Conclusions: The study provides compelling evidence of distinct gait disturbances in patients with CSVD, characterized by reduced step regularity (15%-23% lower than controls), altered acceleration patterns, and significant postural adaptations, particularly forward head positioning (4°-7° more pronounced than controls). These quantifiable differences, detectable through accessible smartphone and video technology, offer potential biomarkers for early CSVD detection and monitoring. The integration of sensor and video analysis provides a more comprehensive assessment approach that could be implemented in both clinical and home settings for longitudinal monitoring of disease progression and rehabilitation outcomes.

Indexed as

Cerebral Small Vessel DiseasesGaitGait Disorders, NeurologicSmartphoneAgedCase-Control StudiesFemaleGait AnalysisHumansMaleMiddle AgedVideo RecordingWalkingaccelerometercerebralcerebral small vessel diseasegaitgait analysismixed methodsmixed methods studymotor functionmotor function assessmentsensorstoolsvideovideo analysisvideo data

Identifiers

PMID40720893
PMCPMC12303540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.