Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40720845›Full record

Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2025

Family Caregivers of Individuals With Neuromuscular Disease Participating in a Randomized Controlled Trial of a Digital Peer Support Program: Nested Qualitative Study.

Samantha Mekhuri, Craig Dale, Francine Buchanan, Nouma Hammash, Munazzah Ambreen, Sian Saha, Louise Rose, Reshma Amin

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Samantha MekhuriDepartment of Paediatrics, Division of Respiratory Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada, 1 6472807374.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-1333-5752
Craig DaleLawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5042-0332
Francine BuchananPatient & Family Engagement, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6579-2489
Nouma HammashSpinal Cord Injury Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-9617-6455
Munazzah AmbreenDepartment of Paediatrics, Division of Respiratory Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada, 1 6472807374.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-0763-0213
Sian SahaKing's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3017-1583
Louise RoseKing's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1700-3972
Reshma AminDepartment of Paediatrics, Division of Respiratory Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada, 1 6472807374.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3032-5434

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Family caregivers have primary responsibility for providing care in the home for people with neuromuscular diseases (NMDs). This may negatively affect caregiver health. Peer support may enhance quality of life and reduce stress among family caregivers, but few trials have been conducted in NMD caregivers. Therefore, we conducted a randomized controlled trial with a nested qualitative evaluation (this report) of a 12-week digital peer support intervention for family caregivers of children and adults with NMD. Objective: The aim of the study is to gain insights into the perspectives of intervention participants and peer mentors regarding their experiences with the trial's digital peer support program. Methods: We conducted a nested exploratory qualitative study (August 2022 to March 2024), recruiting participants who were randomized to the intervention arm of the randomized controlled trial and study mentors. We conducted semistructured interviews via videoconferencing. Homophily theory and the theoretical framework of acceptability informed our analyses. Results: We interviewed 21 participants and 10 mentors, identifying four themes: (1) program participation motivators, (2) program expectations and appreciation, (3) program appropriateness, and (4) the peer mentor-mentee dyad. We found that participants were motivated to join the program due to existing caregiver burden and social isolation. Participants and mentors appreciated the program's sense of community and flexible digital format, with participants valuing emotional and informational support. However, challenges in relating to each other's situations due to participant and mentor heterogeneity in the extent of the care recipient's needs were perceived to limit benefit. Conclusions: Peer support was perceived as potentially beneficial in relieving caregiver burden and social isolation, creating a sense of community that provides emotional and informational support. The digital and flexible format was an important facilitator. An important barrier was participant-mentor heterogeneity resulting in reduced perception of homophily. These findings can inform the development of other digital peer support programs to alleviate caregiver burden and isolation and provide emotional relief and informational guidance.

Indexed as

CaregiversFamilyNeuromuscular DiseasesPeer GroupSocial SupportAdultAgedChildFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchQuality of Lifedigitalfamily caregiversneuromuscular diseasepeer supportqualitative

Identifiers

PMID40720845
PMCPMC12303555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.