Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2025
Population-Based Digital Health Interventions to Deliver at-Home COVID-19 Testing: SCALE-UP II Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Population health and implementation outcomes of self-testing for SARS-CoV-2 using antigen detecting diagnostics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Cascade Chatbot: A Scalable Approach to Family-Based Genetic Testing for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2026Article
- GARDE-Chat: a scalable, open-source platform for building and deploying health chatbots.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Digital health interventions could be a scalable approach to delivering at-home COVID-19 testing. Objective: SCALE-UP II aimed to investigate the effectiveness of 3 digital health interventions on the delivery of mailed at-home COVID-19 testing: SMS text messaging, automated chatbot, and patient navigation upon request. Methods: The study was a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Participants who self-reported that they had a smartphone were randomized in a 2×2×2 factorial design (smartphone study) to receive (1) chatbot or text messaging, (2) the option to request patient navigation, and (3) intervention frequency every 10 or 30 days. All other participants were randomized in a 2×2 factorial design (nonsmartphone study) to receive the option to request patient navigation and intervention frequency every 10 or 30 days. Study settings were safety net community health centers located across the state of Utah, United States. Eligible patients were >18 years old, with a primary care visit in the last 3 years, and a valid cellphone in the community health centers electronic health record. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants requesting at-home COVID-19 tests. Results: The trial enrolled 2117 in the smartphone study and 31,439 in the nonsmartphone study. In the smartphone study, the proportion of participants who requested test kits in the Chatbot arm was lower than in SMS text messaging (174/1051, 16.6% vs 555/1066, 52.1%; adjusted risk ratio (aRR) 0.317, 98.33% CI 0.27-0.38; P<.001). In the nonsmartphone study, the proportion of participants who requested test kits was higher if they were messaged every 10 days rather than every 30 days (860/15,717, 5.5% vs 752/15,722, 4.8%; aRR 1.144, 97.5% CI 1.03-1.28; P=.005). However, participants in the 10-day versus 30-day condition were more likely to opt out of receiving study interventions (1977/15,717, 12.6% vs 1147/15,722, 7.3%; aRR 1.72, 97.5% CI 1.59-1.86; P<.001). In the nonsmartphone study, the proportion of participants who requested test kits was lower for those in the patient navigation condition compared with no patient navigation (680/15,718, 4.3% vs 932/15,721, 5.9%; aRR 0.729, 97.5% CI 0.65-0.81; P<.001). Conclusions: Simple bidirectional text messaging was more effective than an interactive web-based chatbot on the delivery of COVID-19 testing. Although messaging every 10 days was more effective than every 30 days, it also led to a larger opt-out rate. Digital health interventions based on automated bidirectional SMS text messaging are a simple, scalable, and low-cost strategy to offer access to at-home COVID-19 testing. Similar approaches may be used to support public health response and other forms of at-home testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.