ArticleJMIR research protocols2025
Developing an AI Governance Framework for Safe and Responsible AI in Health Care Organizations: Protocol for a Multimethod Study.
Article in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence Governance in Health Systems: Systematic Review of Frameworks and Integrative Model Proposal.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Real-World Implementation and Evaluation of AI-Driven Clinical Decision Support in Emergency Medicine: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Trustworthy AI-Powered Intrusion Detection for the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT): A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Social Health: A Narrative Review of Uses, Advantages, Challenges, and Future Directions.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A Generalized Responsible AI Framework for Trustworthy Clinical Prediction: Explainability, Fairness, Performance, and Uncertainty in Alzheimer's Disease Modeling.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Trustworthy and ethical intrusion detection for healthcare internet of medical things using reinforcement learning and governance rules.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Governance for safe and responsible AI in healthcare organisations: a scoping review of frameworks.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Using data and artificial intelligence to improve care pathways of older people experiencing falls and frailty: Opportunities, challenges and practical considerations for clinicians.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2026Review
- Reimagining psychiatric care with agentic AI: promise, challenges, and a roadmap forward.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Review
- From principles to practice: an actionable framework for AI governance in healthcare organisations.BMJ digital health & AI · 2026Article
- Promise to Practice: Reimagining Artificial Intelligence for Equitable Global Health Impact.Annals of global health · 2026Review
- How professional logics shape AI implementation in mental healthcare: a qualitative study of an LLM-enhanced chatbot.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Evidence-based action plan for integrating artificial intelligence in an academic medical centre-a multidisciplinary approach.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to improve health care delivery through enhanced diagnostics, streamlined operations, and predictive analytics. However, health care organizations face substantial challenges in implementing AI safely and responsibly. This is due to regulatory complexity, ethical considerations, and a lack of practical governance frameworks. While many theoretical frameworks exist, few have been tested or adapted for real-world application in health care settings.
objectiveThis study aims to develop and validate a practical AI governance framework to support the safe and responsible use of AI in health care organizations. The specific objectives are to identify governance requirements for AI in health care, examine existing AI governance processes and best practices, codevelop an AI governance framework to meet the needs of health care organizations, and test and refine the framework through real-world application.
methodsA multimethod research design will be used, comprising four key stages: (1) a scoping review and document analysis to identify governance needs and current processes, (2) in-depth interviews with health care stakeholders as well as national and international AI governance experts, (3) development of a draft AI governance framework through a synthesis of findings, and (4) validation and refinement of the framework through stakeholder workshops and application to case studies of AI tools. Data will be analyzed using qualitative methods informed by grounded theory.
resultsThe project received funding in October 2023. Ethics approval was obtained from the Alfred Health Human Research Ethics Committee (project 171/24) and the Macquarie University Human Research Ethics Committee (project 16508). Data collection commenced in April 2024, with the scoping review and document analysis being finalized. As of March 2025, a total of 43 interviews have been completed. The final AI governance framework is expected to be completed and ready for dissemination by June 2025.
conclusionsThis study will deliver a comprehensive AI governance framework co-designed with health care stakeholders to address real-world challenges in AI oversight. The framework will offer practical guidance to support health care organizations in adopting AI technologies safely, ethically, and in alignment with regulatory requirements. Outcomes from this study will inform local and international discussions on AI governance and promote the responsible integration of AI in health systems. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/75702.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.