ArticleSleep2025
A bistable stochastic model quantifies performance degradation during sleep deprivation.
Article in Sleep, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Exploring the differences in neural oscillation mechanisms before and after sleep deprivation.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sleep deprivation impairs sustained attention, as measured on the psychomotor vigilance task. This is manifested in a general slowing of reaction times and an increase in periods of unresponsiveness, increasing the risk of accidents. However, the mechanisms are not fully understood. This study combines experiments and modeling to better explain and quantify the changes of sustained attention under sleep deprivation. A total of 317 male participants (age 22.1 $\pm$ 2.7 y) underwent 40 h of sleep deprivation under a constant routine protocol. A 10-minute psychomotor vigilance task was performed at 2-h intervals, and saliva melatonin was sampled every hour to monitor circadian phase. We report a bimodal distribution of reaction speed in the data. An approximately normal primary peak characterizes typical performance (reaction time ≲0.5 s), while periods of unresponsiveness correspond to reaction times ≳1.5 s and are reflected in a secondary peak which emerges after ∼20 h of wakefulness. We developed a minimal, stochastic model that accurately reproduces the data, attributing the bimodality of the distribution to bistability in vigilance state. We find general response slowing to be subject to an ultradian oscillation (∼3 cycles per day), while periods of unresponsiveness are disproportionately affected during the wake maintenance zone. Our results attribute periods of unresponsiveness to the coexistence of two vigilance states in the sleep-deprived brain, enabling new approaches in understanding vulnerability to sleep loss. Statement of Significance Sleep deprivation is prevalent in modern society, leading to an increased risk of accidents due to lapses in attention. In many scenarios, like shiftwork, simply getting more sleep is not an option, so a better understanding of mechanisms is needed. Our study, for the first time, shows a bimodality of response rates during sleep deprivation. We explain this by the co-existence of two vigilance states in the brain. The first state corresponds to typical reaction times in all individuals, while the second state is linked to unresponsiveness with reaction times ≳1.5 s and is observed in ∼60% of individuals. Our model enables new approaches to predict and prevent accidents and new insights into the physiology of sustained attention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.