Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40720715›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2025

Modified Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Irinotecan, and Oxaliplatin or S-1, Irinotecan, and Oxaliplatin Versus Nab-Paclitaxel + Gemcitabine in Metastatic or Recurrent Pancreatic Cancer (GENERATE, JCOG1611): A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase II/III Trial.

Akihiro Ohba, Masato Ozaka, Junki Mizusawa, Takuji Okusaka, Satoshi Kobayashi, Taro Yamashita, Masafumi Ikeda, Ichiro Yasuda, Kazuya Sugimori, Naoki Sasahira and 11 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Akihiro OhbaDivision of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9153-3798
Masato OzakaDepartment of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5666-1970
Junki MizusawaJCOG Data Center, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8123-5298
Takuji OkusakaDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chuo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1729-807X
Satoshi KobayashiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2535-6586
Taro YamashitaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3383-9131
Masafumi IkedaDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4050-2086
Ichiro YasudaThird Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6888-0310
Kazuya SugimoriGastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1596-0744
Naoki SasahiraDepartment of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0672-7214
Kenji IkezawaDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7517-8960
Ikuya MikiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hyogo Cancer Center, Akashi, Japan.
Naohiro OkanoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Mitaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4098-5217
Nobumasa MizunoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9704-1885
Masayuki FurukawaDepartment of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatology, National Hospital Organization, Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1278-0775
Hirofumi ShirakawaDepartment of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Tochigi Cancer Center, Utsunomiya, Japan.
Yusuke SanoJCOG Operations Office, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chuo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7753-8712
Hiroshi KatayamaJCOG Operations Office, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chuo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9735-6630
Junji FuruseDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0663-6117
Makoto UenoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4480-0029
Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG-HBPOG)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeModified fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFIRINOX) and nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine are recommended as first-line treatments for metastatic pancreatic cancer. S-1, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (S-IROX) demonstrated activity in a phase Ib trial in this population. Therefore, these three regimens were directly compared.

methodsThis randomized phase II/III trial was performed at 45 centers in Japan. Eligible patients age 20-75 years with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 and pathologically confirmed metastatic or recurrent pancreatic cancer were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive mFOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m

resultsA total of 527 patients were enrolled, with 426 included in the planned interim analysis. The median OS was 14.0 months (hazard ratio [HR], 1.31 [95% CI, 0.97 to 1.77]) and 13.6 months (HR, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.00 to 1.82]) in the mFOLFIRINOX and S-IROX groups, respectively, as compared with 17.1 months in the nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine group. The predictive probability of achieving superiority in the final analysis was <1% in both groups. Thus, the trial was terminated owing to its futility. Grade 3 to 4 anorexia was more frequent in the mFOLFIRINOX (23.3%) and S-IROX (27.5%) groups than in the nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine group (5.0%).

conclusionNeither mFOLFIRINOX nor S-IROX appeared to be superior compared with nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine as the first-line treatment for metastatic or recurrent pancreatic cancer.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPancreatic NeoplasmsAdultAgedAlbuminsDeoxycytidineDrug CombinationsFemaleFluorouracilGemcitabineHumansIrinotecanLeucovorinMaleMiddle Aged130-nm albumin-bound paclitaxelAlbuminsDeoxycytidineDrug CombinationsFluorouracilfolfirinoxGemcitabineIrinotecanLeucovorinOxaliplatinOxonic AcidPaclitaxelS 1 (combination)Tegafur

Identifiers

PMID40720715
PMCPMC12573688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.