Trial reportThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2026
Tolvaptan vs Fluid Restriction in Moderate-Profound Hyponatremia: An Open-Label Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
contextCurrent first-line therapy for hyponatremia, fluid restriction (FR), is often unsuccessful. Tolvaptan, an arginine vasopressin V2-receptor antagonist, is effective; however, concerns about plasma sodium (pNa) overcorrection risk have limited its uptake.
objectiveThis work aimed to compare the efficacy of tolvaptan and FR, with a prespecified protocol for dextrose 5% intervention if sodium correction targets were exceeded.
methodsAn open-label, randomized trial was conducted at a single-center tertiary hospital, Austin Health, in Melbourne, Australia. Fifty-four hospitalized patients with pNa 115 to 130 mmol/L (mean 124 mmol/L) were enrolled and randomized to tolvaptan 7.5 mg oral daily or FR less than 1000 mL/day (1:1) for 3 days, with daily titration according to pNa response. Main outcome measures included plasma sodium change from day 1 to 4, requirement for intravenous 5% dextrose to prevent or treat overcorrection, symptom measures, and length of hospital stay.
resultsPlasma sodium concentrations increased more in the tolvaptan group, compared to FR, over 3 days (Poverall < .001). The mean adjusted difference in pNa between groups at days 2, 3, and 4 was 3.2 (95% CI, 1.6-4.7), 3.5 (95% CI, 1.9-5.2), and 2.5 mmol/L (95% CI, 0.8-4.2), respectively. Five tolvaptan recipients (19%) required dextrose 5% to treat rapid sodium increase. With this intervention, no patient had an Na increase more than10 mmol/L at 24 hours. There was no difference in length of stay or symptoms.
conclusionTolvaptan was superior to FR at raising pNa over 3 days. However, intervention was required to prevent overcorrection in some, with no benefit in secondary outcomes. This is the first prospectively validated protocol to detect and prevent tolvaptan-related overcorrection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.