Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40720535›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

AMFormer-based framework for accident responsibility attribution: Interpretable analysis with traffic accident features.

Yahui Wang, Zhoushuo Liang, Yue He, Jiahao Wu, Pengfei Tian, Zhicheng Ling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yahui WangSchool of Medical Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2913-7011
Zhoushuo LiangSchool of Medical Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China.
Yue HeSchool of Medical Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China.
Jiahao WuSchool of Computer Science, South-Central Minzu University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Pengfei TianSchool of Software, Liaoning Technical University, Huludao, Liaoning, China.
Zhicheng LingSchool of Humanities and Management, Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, Anhui, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurately determining responsibility in traffic accidents is crucial for ensuring fairness in law enforcement and optimizing responsibility standards. Traditional methods predominantly rely on subjective judgments, such as eyewitness testimonies and police investigations, which can introduce biases and lack objectivity. To address these limitations, we propose the AMFormer(Arithmetic Feature Interaction Transformer) framework-a deep learning model designed for robust and interpretable traffic accident responsibility prediction. By capturing complex interactions among key factors through spatiotemporal feature modeling, this framework facilitates precise multi-label classification of accident responsibility. Furthermore, we employ SHAP (SHapley Additive Interpretation) analysis to improve transparency by identifying the most influential features in attribution of responsibility, and provide an in-depth analysis of key features and how they combine to significantly influence attribution of responsibility. Experiments conducted on real-world datasets demonstrate that AMFormer outperforms both other deep learning models and traditional approaches, achieving an accuracy of 93.46% and an F1-Score of 93%. This framework not only enhances the credibility of traffic accident responsibility attribution but also establishes a foundation for future research into autonomous vehicle responsibility.

Indexed as

Accidents, TrafficDeep LearningLaw EnforcementHumans

Identifiers

PMID40720535
PMCPMC12303312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.