ArticlePloS one2025
AMFormer-based framework for accident responsibility attribution: Interpretable analysis with traffic accident features.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of the level of responsibility in pedestrian crashes using machine learning algorithms.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurately determining responsibility in traffic accidents is crucial for ensuring fairness in law enforcement and optimizing responsibility standards. Traditional methods predominantly rely on subjective judgments, such as eyewitness testimonies and police investigations, which can introduce biases and lack objectivity. To address these limitations, we propose the AMFormer(Arithmetic Feature Interaction Transformer) framework-a deep learning model designed for robust and interpretable traffic accident responsibility prediction. By capturing complex interactions among key factors through spatiotemporal feature modeling, this framework facilitates precise multi-label classification of accident responsibility. Furthermore, we employ SHAP (SHapley Additive Interpretation) analysis to improve transparency by identifying the most influential features in attribution of responsibility, and provide an in-depth analysis of key features and how they combine to significantly influence attribution of responsibility. Experiments conducted on real-world datasets demonstrate that AMFormer outperforms both other deep learning models and traditional approaches, achieving an accuracy of 93.46% and an F1-Score of 93%. This framework not only enhances the credibility of traffic accident responsibility attribution but also establishes a foundation for future research into autonomous vehicle responsibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.