ArticlePloS one2025
Speaker differences in volitional voice modulation reflected in empathy and functional activation patterns.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The role of picture books in supporting children's emotions: perspectives of Saudi kindergarten teachers.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
How we use our voice is central to how we express information about ourselves to others. A speaker's dispositional social reactivity might contribute to how well they can volitionally modulate their voice to manage listener impressions. Here, we investigated individual differences in social vocal control performance in relation to social reactivity indices and underlying neural mechanisms. Twenty-four right-handed speakers of British English (twenty females) modulated their voice to communicate social traits (sounding likeable, hostile, intelligent) while undergoing a rapid-sparse fMRI protocol. Performance in social vocal control was operationalized as the specificity with which speakers evoked trait percepts in an independent group of naïve listeners. Speakers' empathy levels, as well as psychopathic and Machiavellian traits, were assessed using self-report questionnaires. The ability to express specific social traits in voices was associated with activation in brain regions involved in vocal motor and social processing (left posterior TPJ, bilateral SMG, premotor cortex). While dispositional cognitive empathy predicted general vocal performance, self-reported levels of Machiavellianism were specifically related to better performance in expressing likeability. These findings highlight the psychological and neural mechanisms involved in strategic social voice modulation, suggesting differential processing in a combined network of vocal control and social processing streams.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.