ArticlePloS one2025
Addressing food insecurity in early childhood programs through a health equity lens: A qualitative case study of Brazil's Criança Feliz program.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Food Poverty and Early Childhood Development Across Food Insecurity Levels in Brazil.Maternal & child nutrition · 2026Article
- Nurturing Care Systems Underlying Early Childhood Food Insecurity in Brazil: A Causal Loop Diagram Approach.Maternal & child nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFood insecurity negatively impacts early childhood health and development. Recommendations for establishing equitable actions to address food insecurity in early childhood programming have not been developed globally. The Brazilian Criança Feliz Program (PCF), one of the largest early childhood programs worldwide, has faced implementation challenges while addressing food insecurity. We aimed to (i) understand how food insecurity affects the PCF's internal (i.e., organizational-level factors) and external (i.e., family-level and system-level factors) implementation contexts, and (ii) develop equity-focused recommendations for early childhood programs to mitigate food insecurity.
methodsQualitative case study analyses of in-depth interviews with PCF implementation teams and families in five Brazilian municipalities. Participants shared their experience with PCF implementation quality, including questions related to food insecurity. A three-stage rapid qualitative approach was used: (a) inductive thematic analysis identified central codes related to food insecurity, (b) deductive approach to organize central codes within themes related to internal and external contexts of PCF operations, and (c) integration of findings into a set of equity-focused recommendations based on the four categories of the Getting to Equity (GTE) framework.
results240 interviews were conducted. Internal programmatic barriers included lack of protocols for screening, referring, and following up with families struggling to access food as well as challenges to engage them in early learning activities. External programmatic barriers included family-level factors (e.g., unrealistic support expected from PCF) and system-level factors (e.g., bureaucracy in accessing safety nets). Ten equity-focused recommendations across GTE framework focused on improving program curriculum and protocols to mitigate food insecurity and increasing individual and community capacity.
conclusionsWe documented barriers at the family, program, and system levels to address food insecurity in the Brazilian PCF home visiting program. Barriers informed the generation of equity-focused programming recommendations to improve practices to address food insecurity, not only for the PCF, but also for the global community implementing home visiting programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.