ArticlePloS one2025
The validity of mid-upper arm circumference as an indicator of underweight, overweight and obesity adults in Bangladesh.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMid-upper-arm circumference (MUAC), as a simple measurement, is an effective alternative to body mass index (BMI) for resource-limited countries such as Bangladesh. The present study aimed to investigate the age- and sex-specific MUAC cut-off points as screening tools for underweight, overweight and obesity in Bangladesh. SUBJECT AND
methodsA nationally representative dataset (BDHS-2017/18) comprising of 12,962 adults individuals (females: 56.5%, mean age: 39.5±16.0 Years, BMI: 22.4±4.1 kg/m2 and MUAC: 27.4±3.1 cm) was analyzed. BMI was categorized as underweight (BMI <18.5 kg/m2), overweight (BMI: 23 kg/m2), or obese (BMI: ≥27.5 kg/m2). A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was conducted to determine the optimal MUAC cut-off, based on Youden Index, for underweight, overweight, and obese individuals. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed, adjusting for age and sex, to explore age and sex-specific changes in the association between MUAC and BMI. Restricted cubic spline and binary logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the risk of underweight, overweight and obesity among different MUAC quartiles.
resultsFor males, MUAC cut-offs were ≤26.5 cm for underweight (AUC: 82.1%, sensitivity: 71.1%, specificity: 77.8%), ≥ 28.5 cm for overweight (AUC: 84.8%, sensitivity: 77.6%, specificity: 76.9%), and ≥29.5 cm for obesity (AUC: 89.4%, sensitivity: 87.8%, specificity: 76.6%) in younger and middle-aged individuals; older males had cut-offs of ≤25.5 cm, ≥ 27.5 cm, and ≥29.5 cm respectively. For females, the cut-offs were lower: ≤ 25.5 cm for underweight in younger and middle-aged, and ≤24.5 cm in older; ≥ 27.5 cm for overweight in younger, and ≥26.5 cm in middle-aged and older; and ≥28.5 cm for obesity in younger and middle-aged, and ≥27.5 cm in older. The MUAC-BMI correlation was strong (R = 0.69, P < 0.001), stronger in males (R = 0.75) than females (R = 0.69). The MUAC cut-off for underweight, overweight, and obesity slightly decreased with age in both sexes.
conclusionAge- and sex-specific MUAC cut-offs are effective for screening underweight, overweight and obesity in Bangladesh.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.