ArticlePLOS digital health2025
Leveraging large language models for automated depression screening.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Large Language Models for Distress Rating in Korean Psycho-Oncology Interviews: Exploratory Clinician-Benchmarked Evaluation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Leveraging prompt-driven generative AI for systematic reviews in digital psychiatry: A stage-matched comparative proof-of-concept for healthcare researchers and clinicians.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Generative Large Language Models in Mental Health Care Settings: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JMIR AI · 2026Review
- Leakage-Free Multimodal Depression Screening: Controlled Evaluation of Text, Facial Behavior, and Prosodic Fusion.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Responsible and innovative AI for mental health care: five priority themes.NPP - digital psychiatry and neuroscience · 2026Review
- Evaluating large language models for assessment of psychosis risk.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Feasibility and user evaluation of HopeBot: An LLM-powered conversational chatbot for depression screening.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Large Language Models for Depression Detection: A Review with Prospects of Incomplete Multimodality.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Automating multi-label crisis detection in psychological support hotlines with pre-trained models.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Depression detection using deep learning and large language models from multimodalities.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mental health diagnoses possess unique challenges that often lead to nuanced difficulties in managing an individual's well-being and daily functioning. Self-report questionnaires are a common practice in clinical settings to help mitigate the challenges involved in mental health disorder screening. However, these questionnaires rely on an individual's subjective response which can be influenced by various factors. Despite the advancements of Large Language Models (LLMs), quantifying self-reported experiences with natural language processing has resulted in imperfect accuracy. This project aims to demonstrate the effectiveness of zero-shot learning LLMs for screening and assessing item scales for depression using LLMs. The DAIC-WOZ is a publicly available mental health dataset that contains textual data from clinical interviews and self-report questionnaires with relevant mental health disorder labels. The RISEN prompt engineering framework was utilized to evaluate LLMs' effectiveness in predicting depression symptoms based on individual PHQ-8 items. Various LLMs, including GPT models, Llama3_8B, Cohere, and Gemini were assessed based on performance. The GPT models, especially GPT-4o, were consistently better than other LLMs (Llama3_8B, Cohere, Gemini) across all eight items of the PHQ-8 scale in accuracy (M = 75.9%), and F1 score (0.74). GPT models were able to predict PHQ-8 items related to emotional and cognitive states. Llama 3_8B demonstrated superior detection of anhedonia-related symptoms and the Cohere LLM's strength was identifying and predicting psychomotor activity symptoms. This study provides a novel outlook on the potential of LLMs for predicting self-reported questionnaire scores from textual interview data. The promising preliminary performance of the various models indicates there is potential that these models could effectively assist in the screening of depression. Further research is needed to establish a framework for which LLM can be used for specific mental health symptoms and other disorders. As well, analysis of additional datasets while fine-tuning models should be explored.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.