ArticlePloS one2025
A cross-sectional study of early marriage among ever-married Somali women: Prevalence, regional differences, and sociodemographic determinants.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prevalence and Determinants of Facility Delivery Among Women in Somalia: Insights from the 2020 Somali Demographic and Health Survey (SDHS).International journal of women's health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to examine the prevalence of early marriage among ever-married Somali women aged 20-49, assess differences across age groups and regions, and identify the main sociodemographic and contextual determinants. The study used the 2020 Somali Health and Demographic Survey dataset. The survey was a representative, three-stage cluster stratified sample, and the data were collected through personal interviews. Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests were used to examine prevalence and differences by background characteristics. Logistic regression modeled the probability of women marrying before 15 or 18 while adjusting for sociodemographic and contextual variables. Three logistic regression models were run; two of these models examined women aged 20-49 for the probability of marrying below age 15 or age 18, while one considered women aged 20-29 in assessing the probability of marriage before age 18. Of the respondents, 24.3% (95% CI: 22.6-26.1) married before 15, while the overall estimated prevalence of marriage before 18 was 41.7% (95% CI: 39.3-44.2). The odds of getting married before 15 (AOR = 1.51, 95% CI: 1.16-1.99, p = 0.002) and 18 (AOR = 2.08, 95% CI: 1.68-2.58, p < 0.001) were higher for the younger age group, 20-29. Women from Somaliland showed lower odds for marrying before age 15 (AOR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.41-0.62, p < 0.001) and below age 18 (AOR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.46-0.66, p < 0.001). Women from lower socioeconomic status showed higher probabilities of early marriage. In the models for women aged 20-49, education had no significant effect. Only among women aged 20-29, education was unexpectedly linked to early marriage, and there were no differences by living in an urban or rural area. Odds ratios were higher for those who accepted domestic violence and lower for those who ever used the internet and participated in household decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.