Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40720366›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Assessing the satisfaction of health professionals towards the introduction of Maathru Samman pants for normal delivery in the labour room: A multi-site mixed method study from India.

Venkatashiva B Reddy, Sirisha Pulla, Anushree Patil, Archana Bhosale, Deepti Tandon, Madhur Verma, Noorin Bhimani, Priti Gupta, Pradeep Aggarwal, Rakesh Kakkar and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Venkatashiva B ReddyDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Mangalagiri, Mangalagiri, Andhra Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8201-8658
Sirisha PullaDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Mangalagiri, Mangalagiri, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Anushree PatilHead of Division of Clinical Research, ICMR-NIRRCH, Mumbai, India.
Archana BhosaleDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lokmanya Tilak Municipal Medical College and General Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Deepti TandonDivision of Clinical Research, Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR)-National Institute For Research in Reproductive and Child Health (NIRRCH), Mumbai, India.
Madhur VermaDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda, Punjab, India.
Noorin BhimaniDepartment of Physiology, Lokmanya Tilak Municipal Medical College and General Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Priti GuptaCentre for Chronic Disease Control, New Delhi, India.
Pradeep AggarwalDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Rakesh KakkarDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda, Punjab, India.
Star PalaDepartment of Community Medicine, North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health and Medical Sciences, Shillong, India.
Wansalan Karu ShullaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health and Medical Sciences, Shillong, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHealthcare professionals play a crucial role in the entire childbirth process. In this study, we studied healthcare workers' response, satisfaction, and demand to use of Maathru Samaan Pants by pregnant women during normal labour. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional, mixed-method study was carried in the year of 2023-2024. The study was carried out in four different regions of India. The health care professionals involved in normal delivery where pregnant women used Maathru Samman Pants, were enrolled in the study total of 20 doctors and 39 nurses were studied using a quantitative questionnaire. For the qualitative component, a total of 14 doctors and 16 nurses' in-depth interviews were conducted. Six FDGs with 29 supporting staff was conducted.

resultsOf the total of 59 healthcare professionals majority of respondents were female, 51 (86.4), and the age range was evenly distributed, with 22(37.3), 21-30 years, 20(33.9), 31-40 years, and 15 (25.4) over 40 years. The majority, 49(83.1), felt that respectful maternity care was extremely important. Most health care staff agreed or strongly agreed that the MSP helped cover their body 58(98.3). A majority found the MSP saved time by preventing dressing/undressing hassle 53(90), and helped with movement before delivery 48 (81.4). A majority, 57 (96.61), agree that the introduction of MSP is a beneficial step towards respectful maternity care. Privacy in both examination and labour rooms is rated highly, with 100% satisfaction across all regions. Most staff support continuing MSP use, 56 (94.91). Some hospitals require additional laundry services or equipment 10 (16.95) or manpower for washing 5 (8.45). Key Themes identified during in-depth interviews and FDGs were comfort, design, acceptability, demand, past experiences, challenges, advantages, funds, reuse, and additional requirements for implementing MSP.

conclusionThe successful integration of MSPs into healthcare settings can drive innovation and improvements, highlighting India's leadership in advancing maternal health initiatives.

Indexed as

Delivery, ObstetricHealth PersonnelAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIndiaLabor, ObstetricParturitionPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40720366
PMCPMC12303262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.