ArticleThe British journal of radiology2025
Diagnostic yield of multiple X-ray imaging requests of lower limb extremities.
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multi-scale feature refinement network for lower limb fracture detection in X-ray images.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe diagnosis pathway for patients presenting in the emergency department with lower limb trauma injuries requires adequate medical imaging of the regions of interest. Due to concerns of concurrent injury or overlapping symptoms, X-rays of multiple lower extremity regions may be requested simultaneously. This article explores the diagnostic yield of imaging multiple lower limb regions following trauma.
methodsA retrospective audit of lower limb imaging requests for patients older than 18 years from 2 hospitals was conducted. Region requested, clinical history, and radiology findings for initial and secondary requests for adjacent body parts within 24 hours were collected and analysed using χ2 analysis.
resultsThere were a total of 1473 examinations with 646 patients. Initial X-rays were significantly more likely to diagnose new, suspicious, and other findings compared to secondary X-rays of adjacent regions (χ2(3) = 377.504, P < .001). Overall, 12.4% (n = 183/1473) of X-rays detected abnormalities such as fractures, and 160 of these 183 abnormalities (87.4%) were detected on the initial X-ray with the remaining 23 abnormalities (12.6%) detected in secondary X-rays. Only 0.9% (n = 6/646) of patients had a concurrent injury.
conclusionX-ray imaging of multiple lower extremities adjacent to injured areas has low diagnostic yield. Thorough clinical assessment is needed to reduce low-value imaging in lower limb trauma. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Concurrent injury in lower limbs injuries is rare. When multiple X-ray requests are made of adjacent regions, 87.4% of all abnormalities were detected on initial imaging. The diagnostic yield of secondary X-rays is very low particularly when patients are asymptomatic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.