Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40720051›Full record

ArticleLifetime data analysis2025

Wild bootstrap for counting process-based statistics: a martingale theory-based approach.

Marina T Dietrich, Dennis Dobler, Mathisca C M de Gunst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lifetime data analysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marina T DietrichDepartment of Mathematics, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. marina.dietrich@uni-a.de.ORCID 0009-0008-6882-2568
Dennis DoblerDepartment of Mathematics, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9040-0854
Mathisca C M de GunstDepartment of Mathematics, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8213-6467

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The wild bootstrap is a popular resampling method in the context of time-to-event data analysis. Previous works established the large sample properties of it for applications to different estimators and test statistics. It can be used to justify the accuracy of inference procedures such as hypothesis tests or time-simultaneous confidence bands. This paper provides a general framework for establishing large sample properties in a unified way by using martingale structures. This framework includes most of the well-known parametric, semiparametric and nonparametric statistical methods in time-to-event analysis. Along the way of proving the validity of the wild bootstrap, a new variant of Rebolledo's martingale central limit theorem for counting process-based martingales is developed as well.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansCounting processesMartingale theoryResamplingStatistical inferenceSurvival analysisWild bootstrap

Identifiers

PMID40720051
PMCPMC12317882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.