ReviewSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2025
Auto-adjusting positive airway pressure: the fine line between engineering and medicine.
Review in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing CPAP Adherence in Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Narrative Review of Practical Strategies for Everyday Clinical Care.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The effect of bilevel ventilation or modified continuous positive airway pressure on treatment adherence in adults with obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Safety principles of lowering inspiratory pressure.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2026Article
- Using CPAP to treat OSA: Is it time to reverse 30 years of understanding and engineering?Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Auto-adjusting positive airway pressure (APAP), unlike continuous PAP (CPAP), dynamically adjusts treatment pressure in response to events detected automatically from a derived flow signal. Introduced in the 90's, APAP quickly became a key tool in sleep clinics, initially serving as a faster alternative to manual titration for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and later also as a long-term treatment option to expedite follow-up visits. APAP and CPAP are overall comparable in terms of adherence, efficacy and control of symptoms. However, concern remains that APAP offers less control of chronic health outcomes, such as blood pressure, kidney function and glycemic values. Other APAP-related challenges entail engineering aspects. A major issue is that APAP algorithms-which govern event detection/identification and pressure adjustments-are proprietary of and vary among manufacturers, making them poorly understood by clinicians. Furthermore, APAP algorithms do not always match-up well when compared to both manual titration or manually scored polysomnography, particularly in the presence of unintentional leak. Variability in event detection, leak compensation, and pressure adjustment algorithms among devices adds another layer of complexity to clinical decision-making. All this complicates the management of OSA patients, who could be left with substantial residual disordered breathing, high leak, and a wide pressure range.This review aims to bridge the gap between the clinical and engineering perspectives of APAP, providing an up-to-date overview of current knowledge and existing challenges that sleep clinicians should consider when managing OSA patients with PAP therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.