Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40719998›Full record

ReviewSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2025

Auto-adjusting positive airway pressure: the fine line between engineering and medicine.

Ludovico Messineo, David P White, Bernard Hete, Michael Knepper, Richard Berry, William H Noah

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Safety principles of lowering inspiratory pressure.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ludovico MessineoDivision of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Departments of Medicine and Neurology, Brigham & Women's Hospital & Harvard Medical School, 221 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, USA. ludovico.messineo@yahoo.it.ORCID 0000-0002-4142-9124
David P WhiteDivision of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Departments of Medicine and Neurology, Brigham & Women's Hospital & Harvard Medical School, 221 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, USA.
Bernard HeteSleep Centers of Middle Tennessee, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, USA.
Michael KnepperSleep Centers of Middle Tennessee, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, USA.
Richard BerryCritical Care & Sleep Medicine, UF Pulmonary, Gainesville, FL, USA.
William H NoahSleep Centers of Middle Tennessee, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Auto-adjusting positive airway pressure (APAP), unlike continuous PAP (CPAP), dynamically adjusts treatment pressure in response to events detected automatically from a derived flow signal. Introduced in the 90's, APAP quickly became a key tool in sleep clinics, initially serving as a faster alternative to manual titration for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and later also as a long-term treatment option to expedite follow-up visits. APAP and CPAP are overall comparable in terms of adherence, efficacy and control of symptoms. However, concern remains that APAP offers less control of chronic health outcomes, such as blood pressure, kidney function and glycemic values. Other APAP-related challenges entail engineering aspects. A major issue is that APAP algorithms-which govern event detection/identification and pressure adjustments-are proprietary of and vary among manufacturers, making them poorly understood by clinicians. Furthermore, APAP algorithms do not always match-up well when compared to both manual titration or manually scored polysomnography, particularly in the presence of unintentional leak. Variability in event detection, leak compensation, and pressure adjustment algorithms among devices adds another layer of complexity to clinical decision-making. All this complicates the management of OSA patients, who could be left with substantial residual disordered breathing, high leak, and a wide pressure range.This review aims to bridge the gap between the clinical and engineering perspectives of APAP, providing an up-to-date overview of current knowledge and existing challenges that sleep clinicians should consider when managing OSA patients with PAP therapy.

Indexed as

Continuous Positive Airway PressurePositive-Pressure RespirationSleep Apnea, ObstructiveAlgorithmsEquipment DesignHumansPolysomnographyAlgorithmsAPAPAutomatic event detectionContinuous positive airway pressureOSA therapyTitration

Identifiers

PMID40719998
PMCPMC12304072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.