ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2026
Effects of the 2019 guideline update on lipid-lowering therapy in patients with acute coronary syndromes.
Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Lipid, Metabolomic and Gut Microbiome Profiles in Long-Term-Hospitalized Cardiac Patients-An Observational and Retrospective Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe European Society of Cardiology regularly updates its clinical practice guidelines. However, it is not well established whether guideline changes have significant effects on actual clinical practice. Therefore, we retrospectively analyzed lipid-lowering therapy at discharge after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in a 1-year period before and a 1-year period after publication of the 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias, respectively. METHODS AND
resultsIn total, we included 691 patients who were discharged alive after AMI. A total of 354 patients were treated in the period before, and 337 after the guideline change. After the guideline change, the proportion of patients discharged on high-dose statin was higher (89.3% vs 80.5%; p = 0.001) and ezetimibe was prescribed more often (31.2% vs 5.9%; p < 0.00001) resulting in more patients being discharged on high-intensity treatment (92.9% vs. 81.6%; p < 0.0001). Median on-treatment LDL-cholesterol was significantly higher in the period before (65 [IQR 47 to 90] mg/dL) than after the publication of the 2019 guidelines (48 [IQR 35 to 69] mg/dL; p < 0.0001). The LDL-C goal of < 55 mg/dL would have been reached by 37.5% patients in the earlier period and was reached by 62.9% in the later period (p < 0.0001).
conclusionsThe update of the 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias was associated with a significant improvement in the prescription of high-dose statin and ezetimibe in patients after ACS. The change of the guidelines rapidly translated into clinical practice resulting in improved risk factor control in patients at very high risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.