ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2026
Fully automated 3D multi-modal deep learning model for preoperative T-stage prediction of colorectal cancer using
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to develop a fully automated 3D multi-modal deep learning model using preoperative
methodsA retrospective cohort of 474 CRC patients was included, with 400 patients for internal cohort and 74 patients for external cohort. Patients were classified into early T-stage (T1-T2) and advanced T-stage (T3-T4) groups. Automatic segmentation of the volume of interest (VOI) was achieved based on TotalSegmentator. A 3D ResNet18-based deep learning model integrated with a cross-multi-head attention mechanism was developed. Five models (CT + PET + Clinic (CPC), CT + PET (CP), PET (P), CT (C), Clinic) and two radiologists' assessment were compared. Performance was evaluated using Area Under the Curve (AUC). Grad-CAM was employed to provide visual interpretability of decision-critical regions.
resultsThe automated segmentation achieved Dice scores of 0.884 (CT) and 0.888 (PET). The CPC and CP models achieved superior performance, with AUCs of 0.869 and 0.869 in the internal validation cohort, respectively, outperforming single-modality models (P: 0.832; C: 0.809; Clinic: 0.728) and the radiologists (AUC: 0.627, P < 0.05 for all models vs. radiologists, except for the Clinical model). External validation exhibited a similar trend, with AUCs of 0.814, 0.812, 0.763, 0.714, 0.663 and 0.704, respectively. Grad-CAM visualization highlighted tumor-centric regions for early T-stage and peri-tumoral tissue infiltration for advanced T-stage.
conclusionThe fully automated multimodal, fusing PET/CT with cross-multi-head-attention, improved T-stage prediction in CRC, surpassing the single-modality models and radiologists, offering a time-efficient tool to aid clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40719866What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.