Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40719856›Full record

ReviewArchives of microbiology2025

Revisiting nitrogen assimilation strategies in the mammalian gut: lessons from Enterobacteriaceae as pathobiont models and a challenge to the limitation paradigm.

Lisa C Harling, Aaron L Hecht, Frank Meyer, Gary D Wu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Construction of RecombinantMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lisa C HarlingDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, U.S.A.. lisa.harling@web.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-9991-7981
Aaron L HechtDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, U.S.A.
Frank MeyerDepartment of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, University Clinic Magdeburg, 39120, Magdeburg, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany.
Gary D WuDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, U.S.A.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intestinal microbiome is dependent on nitrogen to support growth, yet the extent of nitrogen-limitation for microbial expansion in the mammalian gut remains debated. Classical perspectives describe the colon as nitrogen-limited due to the early absorption of dietary nitrogen in the small intestine, prompting the evolution of nitrogen-scavenging. In this mini-review, we focus on Enterobacteriaceae, facultative anaerobes, and clinically relevant pathobionts to examine nitrogen-scavenging and -assimilation systems. Drawing from in vitro, in vivo and ex vivo mono-colonization murine studies in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae, we highlight findings that introduced a paradigm shift by showing that nitrogen-scavenging mechanisms may be dispensable under certain conditions. Rather than refuting nitrogen limitation, we propose a re-evaluation of nutrient limitation in the gut, and a more nuanced model, with carbon and energy sources emerging as potential bottlenecks. This minireview emphasizes Enterobacteriaceae as a pathobiont model for investigating nitrogen metabolism and outlines key knowledge gaps to be addressed in future studies.

Indexed as

EnterobacteriaceaeGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGastrointestinal TractNitrogenAnimalsEscherichia coliHumansKlebsiella pneumoniaeMiceNitrogenEnterobacteriaceaeGut microbiomeGut nitrogen sourcesNitrogen-limitationNitrogen scavenging

Identifiers

PMID40719856
PMCPMC12304020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.