ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2025
Negative emotions weaken the error monitoring ability of patients with borderline personality disorder.
Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) exhibit impaired inhibitory control and heightened affective sensitivity. This study aimed to investigate how negative emotions influence error monitoring in BPD. Twenty-six BPD patients and twenty-eight health controls completed psychological scales assessing borderline symptoms, impulsivity, depression and anxiety. Subsequently, participants performed an emotional stop signal task while electroencephalogram (EEG) data were collected. Error-related neural activity was analyzed, focusing on the amplitude of error-related negativity (ERN), error positivity (Pe), and power values of error-related θ. Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) assessed differences by group and emotion type. Pearson correlations were calculated between error-related EEG variables and psychological scales. Results revealed significant group-by-emotion type interactions for ERN amplitude (F = 27.094, p < 0.001, η²
Indexed as
Identifiers
40719848What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.