ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2025
Evaluating the impact of view position in X-ray imaging for the classification of lung diseases.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical information associated with chest X-ray images, such as view position, patient age and gender, plays a crucial role in image interpretation, as it influences the visibility of anatomical structures and pathologies. However, most classification models using the ChestX-ray14 dataset relied solely on image data, disregarding the impact of these clinical variables. This study aims to investigate which clinical variable affects image characteristics and assess its impact on classification performance. To explore the relationships between clinical variables and image characteristics, unsupervised clustering was applied to group images based on their similarities. Afterwards, a statistical analysis was then conducted on each cluster to examine their clinical composition, by analyzing the distribution of age, gender, and view position. An attention-based CNN model was developed separately for each value of the clinical variable with the greatest influence on image characteristics to assess its impact on lung disease classification. The analysis identified view position as the most influential variable affecting image characteristics. Accounting for this, the proposed approach achieved a weighted area under the curve (AUC) of 0.8176 for pneumonia classification, surpassing the base model (without considering view position) by 1.65% and outperforming previous studies by 6.76%. Furthermore, it demonstrated improved performance across all 14 diseases in the ChestX-ray14 dataset. The findings highlight the importance of considering view position when developing classification models for chest X-ray analysis. Accounting for this characteristic allows for more precise disease identification, demonstrating potential for broader clinical application in lung disease evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.