ArticleCurrent microbiology2025
Diversity of Environmental Escherichia coli in Subtropical Freshwater Systems of South Africa.
Article in Current microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Escherichia coli is widely used as an indicator of faecal contamination, as it is assumed that faeces from warm-blooded animals is the primary source of E. coli in the environment. However, various studies have shown that E. coli can survive and multiply in environmental niches, including soil, sand and sediment. E. coli can be assigned to eight main phylogroups but environmental E. coli are associated primarily with phylogroups A and B1. In this study, 410 E. coli were isolated from different niches within two peri-urban catchments in the Gauteng province of South Africa. To represent the E. coli circulating within the human population, E. coli was also isolated from sewage before treatment and released into these reservoirs. To capture the diversity of E. coli among these isolates, the β-D-glucuronidase (uidA) and mismatch repair (mutS) genes were sequenced. While isolates linked to phylogroup B1 dominated as was expected, the recovery of many isolates linked to phylogroup B2, the second most dominant group, was unanticipated. To further investigate this observation, the genomes of representative phylogroup B2 isolates were sequenced and subjected to phylogenetic and functional analyses. The results showed that phylogroup B2 isolates formed a distinct phylogenetic cluster, apparently independent of niche or geographic origin. Our findings also showed that while isolates seem to be associated with environmental samples, they could have the ability to colonize the gut and cause disease as they harboured several virulence factors associated with extraintestinal E. coli.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.