ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2025
Bidirectional regulation of the brain-gut axis in
Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Gut microbiota remodeling inZoological research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although existing research has uncovered the association between psychological stress and gut microbiota dysbiosis, the causal relationship remains unclear. The direct impact of psychological stress on gut microbiota and the potential bidirectional mechanisms remain unclear, including the specific molecular pathways involved. This study investigates the impact of psychological stress on the gut microbiota and associated metabolites in wild Hainan macaques, revealing that stress significantly alters microbial composition and function. Specifically, stress-induced changes in the gut microbiota are linked to shifts in key metabolites, particularly coumarins, which are known to interact with the nervous system. This suggests a feedback loop where stress modulates neurological function via microbiota-derived metabolites. We identified several differential metabolites, including specific C10757, that can serve as biomarkers for detecting stress-induced health risks. These findings highlight the potential of microbiota-based interventions to mitigate stress-related health issues and provide essential data for wildlife health monitoring. The study highlights the role of gut microbiota as a stress biomarker, underscoring the importance of psychological well-being in wildlife conservation and research to guide ethical animal management. IMPORTANCE: This study uncovers how psychological stress alters gut microbiota in wild animals, enhancing understanding of the gut-brain axis in natural ecosystems. Crucially, it identifies microbial profiles as non-invasive stress biomarkers, enabling early detection of environmental threats in conservation. The findings emphasize the ethical need to incorporate stress assessments (e.g., microbiota and cortisol analyses) into wildlife research to ensure welfare and data validity. Mechanistic parallels with captive species suggest evolutionary conservation of gut-brain pathways, opening avenues for cross-species therapies. By bridging psychobiology and conservation, this work establishes a framework for stress resilience interventions and ethical wildlife management, advancing both ecological health and humane science. Future research should explore microbiota-targeted strategies and cross-species applicability to optimize conservation outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.