Observational studyTranslational vision science & technology2025
Regional and Layer Specific Retinal Capillary Red Blood Cell Velocimetry in Healthy Human Subjects.
Observational study in Translational vision science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Age-Related Neurovascular Dysfunction in the Retina and Potential Pathogenic Mechanisms.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate retinal capillary and choriocapillaris red blood cell (RBC) velocity using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA)-based velocimetry in healthy human subjects. Methods: This was a cross-sectional, observational study using a 1050-nm swept-source OCTA instrument with a new M-B scan protocol to obtain 2 × 2-mm2 volumes in the central, nasal, and temporal macula regions. An eigendecomposition-based analysis estimated the average mean frequency (MF) of moving particles in the radial peripapillary capillaries (RPCs), superficial retinal layer (SRL), deep retinal layer (DRL), and choriocapillaris (CC) in each region. MF is linearly proportional to RBC velocity. A linear mixed model evaluated the effect of retinal layer and region on MF. Results: Sixty-five subjects (median age, 46 years; interquartile range, 27-67; 97 eyes, 54% females) were included in the study. MF values for SRL, DRL, and CC among all regions were 166 ± 44, 106 ± 36, and 313 ± 33Hz, respectively (P < 0.05). The lowest MF was in the RPCs (133 ± 41; P < 0.001). There were significant differences in MFs between age groups, as well as all layers within and across different regions (P < 0.05). In the central macula, there was a correlation between MF and age in the SRL, DRL, and CC (r = -0.581, -0.439, and -0.658, respectively; P < 0.001). Weaker associations were noted in the peripapillary and temporal retina. Conclusions: Retinal and choriocapillaris RBC velocity varies with age, layer, and retinal region. These variations may provide insight into vascular aging and blood flow regulation. Translational Relevance: Age-related and regional changes in capillary and choriocapillaris RBC velocity are important for understanding retinal vascular health and disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.