ArticleJournal of vision2025
Quantification of retinotopic maps with a Gaussian process modeling.
Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Uncertainty in population receptive field estimates revealed by variational qPRF.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Visual neuroscientists use blood oxygenation level-dependent fMRI data to delineate the structure and boundaries of visual-field representations on the human cortex, a process called retinotopic mapping. Although the population receptive field (PRF) model facilitates receptive-field estimation for cortical voxels, retinotopic map quantification still faces challenges. In vivo, retinotopic areas exhibit consistent topology, but modeling this topology is often disrupted by limited resolution and low signal-to-noise ratio. Additionally, automated segregation of visual areas, including the fovea, is lacking. We address these challenges with three innovations: (1) extended polar angle parametrization, (2) cortical anchor point identification, and (3) map estimation via a Gaussian process model. The Gaussian process provided significantly improved estimated generalization error than linear regression and reduced topological violations in estimated maps from 49.2% to 31.5% along the total analyzed cortical mesh from the left hemispheres of 181 subjects from the Human Connectome Project. It automatically defined precise boundaries between the six discrete visual areas, along which the mean 95% credible interval width was 0.104 π rad. Along the estimated eccentricity contour of 3°, the mean 95% credible interval width was 0.586°. We estimated the foveal confluence location from fMRI to be systematically more dorsal and medial than the occipital pole across all subjects. This Gaussian process modeling approach offers a more accurate and reliable method for quantifying retinotopic maps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.