ArticleMolecular ecology resources2025
Effects of Vacuum-Heat-Assisted Sample Desiccation on Microbiome Surveys.
Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of heat-assisted sample desiccation on microbiome surveys.Environmental microbiome · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sample preservation in the field and during transport can be a logistical challenge for microbiome surveys, particularly in remote areas. Sample desiccation eliminates the need for complicated cold chains and dangerous preservatives. However, the effects of desiccation on modern microbiome workflows such as gene-centric metagenomic profiling and metagenome-assembled genome (MAG) binning, remain poorly understood. In addition, most common desiccation tools such as lyophilisation cannot easily be deployed in the field. Here, we describe a proof-of-principle sample desiccator using vacuum and heat, specifically built for deployment in the field and exhibiting low power consumption and cost. We then test the effects of vacuum-heat-assisted sample desiccation followed by storage at room temperature, in comparison to conventional freezing, on multiple soil and animal faecal samples, via metagenomic and 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. We consider multiple metrics related to the success of DNA extraction, sequencing, contig assembly, OTU clustering, gene annotation and MAG construction, as well as effects on inferred microbial community composition. We find that the impact of drying on considered success metrics was almost always either minor, non-significant or positive. For a subset of source materials we observed moderate but statistically significant differences in terms of inferred microbial taxonomic and genetic composition. We conclude that vacuum- and heat-assisted desiccation can be a useful, practical and cost-effective tool for microbiome field surveys, when a high consistency with frozen samples is not required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.