Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40719286›Full record

ReviewBalkan medical journal2025

Recent Insights into the Epidemiology and Management of Anaphylaxis

Sakura Sato, Tsuyoshi Kodachi, Noriyuki Yanagida, Motohiro Ebisawa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Balkan medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Rethinking asthma therapy, part 2: transdermal strategies for adjunct asthma and allergy treatments.Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sakura SatoClinic of Allergy, Clinical Research Center for Allergy and Rheumatology, National Hospital Organization, Sagamihara National Hospital, Kanagawa, JapanORCID 0000-0003-3674-0759
Tsuyoshi KodachiClinic of Allergy, Clinical Research Center for Allergy and Rheumatology, National Hospital Organization, Sagamihara National Hospital, Kanagawa, JapanORCID 0009-0003-3705-3165
Noriyuki YanagidaClinic of Allergy, Clinical Research Center for Allergy and Rheumatology, National Hospital Organization, Sagamihara National Hospital, Kanagawa, JapanORCID 0000-0001-9643-744X
Motohiro EbisawaClinic of Allergy, Clinical Research Center for Allergy and Rheumatology, National Hospital Organization, Sagamihara National Hospital, Kanagawa, JapanORCID 0000-0003-4117-558X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anaphylaxis is a severe, rapidly developing systemic hypersensitivity reaction that can be life-threatening if not promptly identified and treated. Its global incidence is on the rise, especially among children, though fatal outcomes remain uncommon. This review summarizes the current understanding of anaphylaxis, covering its epidemiology, triggers, acute management, and strategies for long-term prevention, with emphasis on cases caused by food, medications, and insect stings. The estimated lifetime prevalence of anaphylaxis ranges from 0.05% to 2%. In children, food is the primary trigger, whereas in adults, medications are the most commonly responsible. The main culprits for food-related anaphylaxis differ by region: in Western countries, peanuts and tree nuts predominate; in East Asia, hen’s eggs and cow’s milk are most frequent; and in Southeast Asia, seafood is the leading cause. Drug-induced anaphylaxis-often the main cause of anaphylaxis-related deaths worldwide-is increasing due to the growing use of chemotherapies and biologic agents. Insect stings cause about 10% of all cases and remain the most common cause of fatal anaphylaxis. Intramuscular adrenaline continues to be the primary treatment, yet its administration is often delayed or insufficiently used. Patients should be prescribed adrenaline autoinjectors following an initial reaction, but availability and usage rates differ widely across countries. Education for patients and caregivers and the creation of clear action plans are essential. New alternatives, such as intranasal and sublingual adrenaline devices, are being developed to improve access and minimize hesitation in treatment. For prevention, VIT is well established and highly effective, preventing systemic reactions in over 90% of cases. Drug desensitization enables safe administration of necessary medications despite confirmed allergies, and this approach is suitable for all ages, including children. Oral immunotherapy for food allergens can increase tolerance levels and lower the chance of accidental exposure in selected patients, though safety concerns limit its widespread use. Biologic therapies like omalizumab present new treatment avenues for patients with multiple food or drug allergies. Recent studies have shown that omalizumab can raise the threshold for reactions to peanuts and other allergens in children. Case reports also indicate it may improve safety during drug desensitization, including for chemotherapy. Ongoing progress in diagnosis, emergency readiness, immunotherapies, and biologics continue to broaden the range of options for managing anaphylaxis. Nonetheless, gaps in access, awareness, and supporting evidence-particularly for children and older adults-underscore the need for additional research and health system investment.

Indexed as

AnaphylaxisDisease ManagementChildEpinephrineHumansIncidencePrevalenceEpinephrine

Identifiers

PMID40719286
PMCPMC12402951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.