ReviewImmunotherapy2025
The use of durvalumab and tremelimumab after atezolizumab and bevacizumab in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: case report and literature review.
Review in Immunotherapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rechallenge with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Narrative Review.Liver cancer · 2026Review
- Review
- Prolonged Disease Stability with Durvalumab and Tremelimumab Rechallenge Following Prior Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Case Report.Oncology research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) often presents at an advanced stage, limiting treatment options. Historically, systemic therapies like tyrosine kinase inhibitors and VEGF-targeted antibodies offered modest survival benefits. HCC's immunosuppressive microenvironment, driven by regulatory T cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and immune checkpoint signaling, hinders effective therapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs) have revolutionized HCC management by targeting these pathways. Atezolizumab and bevacizumab (Atezo/Bev) is the standard first-line therapy for unresectable HCC, but post-progression options are limited. We explore the potential of switching to durvalumab and tremelimumab (Durva/Treme) as a second-line strategy. Recently approved, Durva/Treme shows promise, yet data on sequential ICPI use remain scarce. This editorial highlights the rationale for this approach, leveraging distinct immune targets to overcome resistance. Preliminary evidence suggests durable responses are achievable, but robust clinical trials are needed to validate efficacy, optimize sequencing, and identify biomarkers. Durva/Treme's role as a second-line option could address the critical gap in HCC treatment, challenging the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. We advocate for bold innovation to improve outcomes in this complex disease, urging further research into ICPI rechallenge strategies to transform the therapeutic landscape for patients with unresectable HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.