Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40719214›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology2025

Museomics and Salvaged Feathers Piece Together the Evolutionary History and Conservation Genomics of the Elusive, Critically Endangered Night Parrot (Pezoporus occidentalis).

Heng Lin Yeap, Gunjan Pandey, Jeremy J Austin, John G Oakeshott, Christopher M Hardy, Stephen A Murphy, Nicholas P Leseberg, Allan H Burbidge, Kenny J Travouillon, Leo Joseph and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Heng Lin YeapApplied Genomics Initiative, Environment, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4434-887X
Gunjan PandeyApplied Genomics Initiative, Environment, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3514-4624
Jeremy J AustinSchool of Biological Sciences, Australian Centre for Ancient DNA, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4244-2942
John G OakeshottApplied Biosciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8324-7874
Christopher M HardyApplied Genomics Initiative, Environment, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7419-566X
Stephen A MurphyConservation Partners, Malanda, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6036-7600
Nicholas P LesebergResearch and Recovery of Endangered Species Group, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6233-2236
Allan H BurbidgeDepartment of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Kensington, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2136-3973
Kenny J TravouillonCollections and Research Centre, Western Australian Museum, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1734-4742
Leo JosephAustralian National Wildlife Collection, National Research Collections Australia, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7564-1978
Anna M KearnsAustralian National Wildlife Collection, National Research Collections Australia, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8502-7442

Funding

Bioplatforms Australia
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Night Parrot is a critically endangered nocturnal bird of Australia's arid zone. The species was "lost" for most of the 20th century until its rediscovery in 1990. Extant populations are now known in eastern and western Australia, but the species has been extirpated from much of its historical range. Here we estimate critically needed Essential Biodiversity Variables (EBVs) for the Night Parrot from historical and opportunistically collected contemporary samples. We find little population structure across the species' range and evidence of recent connectivity between extant populations ~2000 km apart. Most eastern individuals show significant kinship with one another, as did two from an extinct population in southern Australia. Heterozygosity is similarly low in all extant populations but ten-fold lower in the extinct population sampled. Coalescent modelling of effective population size (Ne) suggests that Night Parrot numbers were reasonably high until around 90 years ago when Ne crashed from ~10,000 to ~100. Current Ne is now at its lowest in the past several million years. Our findings will help guide the ongoing management of one of Australia's most threatened birds.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionConservation of Natural ResourcesEndangered SpeciesFeathersGenetics, PopulationParrotsAnimalsAustraliaBiodiversityGenetic VariationGenomicsMuseumsPopulation Densityarid zoneAustraliaEBVskinshipmitogenomemuseomicsnight parrot

Identifiers

PMID40719214
PMCPMC12421492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.