ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025
Decoding Handwriting Trajectories from Intracortical Brain Signals for Brain-to-Text Communication.
Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence for brain-to-speech decoding in paralysis: a systematic review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Pooled it
- Advances in neuroprostheses: interfaces, materials, and applications.Nano convergence · 2026Review
- Low-power differencing feature extracts spiking-band activities for high-performance intracortical brain-computer interfaces.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Cortical representation of multidimensional handwriting movement and implications for neuroprostheses.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Neural and motor mechanisms of handwriting: from healthy aging to neurodegenerative disorders.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Review
- Decoding Handwriting Trajectories from Intracortical Brain Signals for Brain-to-Text Communication.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The potential to decode handwriting trajectories from brain signals has yet to be fully explored in clinical brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). Here, intracortical neural signals are recorded from a paralyzed individual during attempted handwriting of complex characters. An innovative decoding framework is introduced to address both shape and temporal distortions between neural activity and movement, effectively resolving the misalignment issue commonly encountered in clinical BCIs due to the lack of accurate movement labels. The results demonstrated the reconstruction of highly accurate and human-recognizable handwriting trajectories, significantly outperforming conventional methods. Furthermore, the new framework enabled effective multi-day data fusion, leading to additional improvements in trajectory quality. By employing a dynamic time warping approach to translate trajectories into text, a recognition rate up to 91.1% is achieved within a 1000-character database. Additionally, the framework is applied to reconstruct single-trial trajectories of English letters using a previously published dataset, achieving similarly high recognition rates. Collectively, these findings present a novel BCI decoding scheme capable of accurately reconstructing handwriting trajectories, demonstrating its applicability to both alphabetic and logographic brain-to-text translation. This approach has the potential to revolutionize communication for individuals with motor impairments by enabling accurate brain-to-text translation across diverse languages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.