Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40718934›Full record

ArticleNursing in critical care2025

Effect of Repeated Education on ICU Nurses' Knowledge and Performance in MDRO Infection Control: A Pretest-Posttest Study.

Kyeongmin Jang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing in critical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kyeongmin JangDepartment of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Daejin University, Pocheon-si, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3599-4183

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) pose a serious threat to patient safety in intensive care units (ICUs), where invasive procedures and extensive antibiotic use elevate the risk of transmission. Although educational interventions can enhance infection control compliance, their effects often decline over time.

aimTo evaluate the effectiveness and sustainability of a repeated education programme on ICU nurses' knowledge and performance related to MDRO infection control. STUDY

designA one-group pretest-posttest study.

resultsForty-three ICU nurses received three monthly 50-min education sessions. Knowledge scores significantly increased from 19.60 (SD = 1.62) at baseline to 21.79 (SD = 1.60) 2 weeks post-intervention and were maintained at 21.42 (SD = 1.40) after 3 months (p < 0.001). Performance scores also improved from 94.65 (SD = 11.69) to 101.49 (SD = 8.29) and remained elevated at 102.63 (SD = 7.26) (p < 0.001). No significant decline was observed between the post-intervention measurements.

conclusionsRepeated education significantly improved and sustained ICU nurses' knowledge and performance in MDRO infection control. The spaced and unit-based format supports routine integration and reinforcement of infection control competencies. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Brief, structured and repeated education sessions can be feasibly incorporated into ICU training programmes. This approach may strengthen adherence to MDRO prevention protocols and improve patient safety in high-risk clinical settings.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceCritical Care NursingCross InfectionDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialEducation, Nursing, ContinuingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeInfection ControlNursing Staff, HospitalAdultFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMalecritical care nursinginfection controlknowledge retentionmultidrug‐resistant organismsnursing performancerepeated education

Identifiers

PMID40718934
PMCPMC12301955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.