ArticlePerspectives in clinical research
A pharmacoeconomic study using the willingness to pay model for postexposure prophylaxis for animal bites at a public sector tertiary referral center.
Article in Perspectives in clinical research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: Rabies is a neglected, vaccine-preventable, zoonotic, viral disease that affecting the central nervous system. Understanding its economic burden will aid in developing strategies to reduce mortality. Aims: The aims of this study were to assess willingness to pay (WTP) for postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) for anti-rabies vaccination (ARV). Setting and Design: This was a a cross-sectional, interview based, pharmacoeconomic study. Subjects and Methods: After ethics approval and written informed consent, patients visiting the institute for PEP were enrolled and explained the bidding game strategy, and details of their socioeconomic strata (SES) were collected. Participants were asked regarding the WTP with a predecided starting bid amount of Indian rupees (INR) 2500/- for complete ARV. Based on their first response, this amount was either reduced or increased by INR 500/- until a final WTP reached. This was similarly done for travel and supporting medications. Statistical Analysis Used: Both descriptive and inferential (regression) statistics were applied. WTP was taken as the dependent variable, whereas demographic and animal bite-related parameters were taken as independent covariates. All analyses were done at 5% significance. Results: A total of Conclusion: Lower socioeconomic strata are associated with lower WTP. Although this is challenging to address, raising awareness about completing vaccinations is crucial, as rabies is 100% fatal once the central nervous system is affected and clinical symptoms appear.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.