Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40718880›Full record

ArticlePerspectives in clinical research

A pharmacoeconomic study using the willingness to pay model for postexposure prophylaxis for animal bites at a public sector tertiary referral center.

Roopa Parida, Nithya Jaideep Gogtay, Vijaya Laxman Chaudhari, Ananya Rakshit, Balaji Mane, Prachi V Bhoir, Vipin Subhash Mokalkar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives in clinical research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Roopa ParidaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Hospital Administration, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Nithya Jaideep GogtayDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Hospital Administration, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Vijaya Laxman ChaudhariDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Hospital Administration, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Ananya RakshitDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Hospital Administration, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Balaji ManeDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Hospital Administration, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Prachi V BhoirDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Hospital Administration, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Vipin Subhash MokalkarDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Hospital Administration, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Context: Rabies is a neglected, vaccine-preventable, zoonotic, viral disease that affecting the central nervous system. Understanding its economic burden will aid in developing strategies to reduce mortality. Aims: The aims of this study were to assess willingness to pay (WTP) for postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) for anti-rabies vaccination (ARV). Setting and Design: This was a a cross-sectional, interview based, pharmacoeconomic study. Subjects and Methods: After ethics approval and written informed consent, patients visiting the institute for PEP were enrolled and explained the bidding game strategy, and details of their socioeconomic strata (SES) were collected. Participants were asked regarding the WTP with a predecided starting bid amount of Indian rupees (INR) 2500/- for complete ARV. Based on their first response, this amount was either reduced or increased by INR 500/- until a final WTP reached. This was similarly done for travel and supporting medications. Statistical Analysis Used: Both descriptive and inferential (regression) statistics were applied. WTP was taken as the dependent variable, whereas demographic and animal bite-related parameters were taken as independent covariates. All analyses were done at 5% significance. Results: A total of Conclusion: Lower socioeconomic strata are associated with lower WTP. Although this is challenging to address, raising awareness about completing vaccinations is crucial, as rabies is 100% fatal once the central nervous system is affected and clinical symptoms appear.

Indexed as

Animal biteantirabies vaccinationbidding gamecostwillingness to payzero by 30

Identifiers

PMID40718880
PMCPMC12288922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.