ArticleGMS journal for medical education2025
Sexuality and society in the medical context: Conceptualization, implementation and evaluation of a student-led elective course in medical school at Leipzig University.
Article in GMS journal for medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Serendipity in medical education.GMS journal for medical education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Physicians often avoid discussing sexual and gender-related health with patients due to discomfort and fear of causing offense, leading to incomplete sexual histories and gaps in care, particularly affecting LGBTQI+ patients who face significant health disparities. This project aimed to address this gap by introducing an elective course titled "Sexuality and Society in the Medical Context" to provide German medical students with the skills and knowledge necessary for effective sexual health discussions. Methods: The course utilized interactive teaching methods, including peer learning and role-playing. Topics covered ranged from sexually transmitted infections to gender diversity and LGBTQI+ health. Student feedback was collected through a structured evaluation to assess the course's impact and effectiveness. Results: Student feedback was highly positive; with participants highlighting the course's engaging format and relevance to their medical education. The evaluation showed high satisfaction with the course's organization, content, and interactive elements. Conclusion: Although the elective course was well received, its limited scope suggests the need to integrate similar training into the core medical curriculum. This integration is crucial for enabling future physicians to systematically address sexual health issues, overcome systematic biases, and foster a supportive environment for all patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.