ArticleGMS journal for medical education2025
"I didn't mean it that way…": Design and evaluation of an elective course on dealing with discrimination in medical communication.
Article in GMS journal for medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Serendipity in medical education.GMS journal for medical education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Experiences of discrimination in the context of medical care are not uncommon and have a significant impact on the health of those affected. For this reason, an elective course (28 units) on "dealing with discrimination in medical communication" was introduced at University Hospital Jena for medical students in the clinical section, which aims to improve the communicative skills of future doctors with marginalized patients. The course was tested for the first time in the winter semester 2023/24. The evaluation was used to check whether the course is suitable for expanding knowledge and skills in dealing with discrimination, as assessed by the students themselves. Methodology: The course includes discrimination-sensitive treatment of blind/visually impaired patients, trans*/non-binary patients, patients with right-wing extremist attitudes and/or conspiracy beliefs, people without health insurance, as well as racism- and trauma-sensitive treatment and the use of language mediation. The course also contained numerous elements for self-reflection and reflection on one's own professional attitude as a doctor. The self-assessment of knowledge and competence gains is based on an online survey at the beginning of the first course and at the end of the last session. Results: The participating students (N=13) had hardly had any contact with the content of the seminar series through their medical studies, although they rated the relevance for their own practical work as high. The evaluation of the pre- and post-survey showed that completing the course led to significant increases in self-assessed knowledge for all course topics. There was an increase in self-assessed competence, particularly in relation to dealing with blind/visually impaired people, traumatized people and the use of interpreters. The ability to self-reflect and deal with one's own weaknesses, as well as the awareness of recognizing discrimination, was rated significantly higher also. Conclusion: The newly designed elective subject could help to subjectively improve medical students' knowledge and skills in dealing with discrimination in medical communication. The findings thus provide a good basis for the development of further teaching concepts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.